Heike Carrie L, Cunningham Michael L, Hing Anne V, Stuhaug Erik, Starr Jacqueline R
Seattle, Wash. From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Craniofacial Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Oct;124(4):1261-1272. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b454bd.
Quantification of facial characteristics is important for research in dysmorphology, otolaryngology, oral and maxillofacial, and plastic surgical disciplines, among others. Three-dimensional surface imaging systems offer a quick and practical method for quantifying craniofacial variation and appear to be highly reliable. However, some sources of measurement error have not yet been thoroughly evaluated.
The authors assessed the reliability of using stereophotogrammetry for measuring craniofacial characteristics in 40 individuals, including 20 without craniofacial conditions and 20 with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The authors recruited staff and relatives of staff, and individuals with a laboratory-confirmed 22q11.2 deletion. Thirty anthropometric measurements were obtained on participants and on three-dimensional images.
Intrarater and interrater reliability for most interlandmark distances on three-dimensional images had intraclass correlation coefficients greater than 95 percent, mean absolute differences of less than 1 mm, relative error measurement less than 5, and technical error of measurement less than 1 mm. The Pearson correlation coefficients of greater than 0.9 for most distances suggest high intermethod reliability between direct and image-based measurements. Three-dimensional image-based measurements were systematically larger for the head length and width, forehead, and skull base widths, and upper and lower facial widths.
This study provides further evidence of the high reliability of three-dimensional imaging systems for several craniofacial measurements, including landmarks and interlandmark distances not included in previous studies. The authors also discuss possible errors introduced with palpable landmarks and when working with less compliant participants, such as children. The authors offer guidelines for establishing protocols that can be tailored to each population and research question to maximize the accuracy of image-based measurements.
面部特征量化对于畸形学、耳鼻喉科、口腔颌面外科和整形外科等学科的研究至关重要。三维表面成像系统为量化颅面变异提供了一种快速实用的方法,且似乎具有很高的可靠性。然而,一些测量误差来源尚未得到充分评估。
作者评估了使用立体摄影测量法测量40名个体颅面特征的可靠性,其中包括20名无颅面疾病个体和20名患有22q11.2缺失综合征的个体。作者招募了工作人员及其亲属,以及经实验室确诊的22q11.2缺失个体。对参与者及其三维图像进行了30项人体测量。
三维图像上大多数界标间距离的测量者内和测量者间可靠性的组内相关系数大于95%,平均绝对差小于1毫米,相对误差测量小于5,测量技术误差小于1毫米。大多数距离的皮尔逊相关系数大于0.9,表明直接测量和基于图像的测量之间具有较高的方法间可靠性。基于三维图像的测量在头长、头宽、前额、颅底宽度以及面部上下宽度方面系统性地更大。
本研究进一步证明了三维成像系统在多项颅面测量中的高可靠性,包括先前研究未涉及的界标和界标间距离。作者还讨论了使用可触及界标以及处理不太配合的参与者(如儿童)时可能引入的误差。作者提供了建立方案的指南,这些方案可根据不同人群和研究问题进行调整,以最大限度提高基于图像测量的准确性。