• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the discriminative accuracy of genomic profiling in the prediction of common complex diseases.基因组分析预测常见复杂疾病的判别准确性评估。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Apr;18(4):485-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.209. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
2
Discriminative accuracy of genomic profiling comparing multiplicative and additive risk models.基因组分析比较乘法风险模型和加法风险模型的判别准确性。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Feb;19(2):180-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.165. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
3
The impact of genotype frequencies on the clinical validity of genomic profiling for predicting common chronic diseases.基因型频率对用于预测常见慢性病的基因组分析临床有效性的影响。
Genet Med. 2007 Aug;9(8):528-35. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31812eece0.
4
Predictive testing for complex diseases using multiple genes: fact or fiction?使用多个基因对复杂疾病进行预测性检测:事实还是虚构?
Genet Med. 2006 Jul;8(7):395-400. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000229689.18263.f4.
5
The genetic interpretation of area under the ROC curve in genomic profiling.ROC 曲线下面积的基因组分析中的遗传解释。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Feb 26;6(2):e1000864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000864.
6
Value of genetic profiling for the prediction of coronary heart disease.基因谱分析在预测冠心病方面的价值。
Am Heart J. 2009 Jul;158(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.022.
7
A unifying framework for evaluating the predictive power of genetic variants based on the level of heritability explained.基于遗传力解释水平评估遗传变异预测能力的统一框架。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Dec 2;6(12):e1001230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001230.
8
An epidemiologic assessment of genomic profiling for measuring susceptibility to common diseases and targeting interventions.一项关于基因组分析用于评估常见疾病易感性及靶向干预的流行病学评估。
Genet Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):38-47. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000105751.71430.79.
9
Determination of the optimal number of markers and individuals in a training population necessary for maximum prediction accuracy in F populations by using genomic selection models.利用基因组选择模型确定F群体中为实现最大预测准确性所需的训练群体中标记和个体的最佳数量。
Genet Mol Res. 2016 Nov 21;15(4):gmr-15-04-gmr.15048874. doi: 10.4238/gmr15048874.
10
Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations.基于标记的永生群体遗传力估计
Genetics. 2015 Feb;199(2):379-98. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.167916. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Three Different Genetic Risk Scores Based on Fatty Liver Index, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Lipidomic for a Nutrigenetic Personalized Management of NAFLD: The Fatty Liver in Obesity Study.基于脂肪肝指数、磁共振成像和脂质组学的三种不同遗传风险评分用于非酒精性脂肪性肝病的营养遗传个性化管理:肥胖中的脂肪肝研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 13;11(6):1083. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061083.
2
Sex-Specific Associations between Gut Prevotellaceae and Host Genetics on Adiposity.肠道普雷沃氏菌科与宿主基因在肥胖方面的性别特异性关联。
Microorganisms. 2020 Jun 22;8(6):938. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060938.
3
Assessing the performance of genome-wide association studies for predicting disease risk.评估全基因组关联研究预测疾病风险的性能。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0220215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220215. eCollection 2019.
4
Models Integrating Genetic and Lifestyle Interactions on Two Adiposity Phenotypes for Personalized Prescription of Energy-Restricted Diets With Different Macronutrient Distribution.整合遗传与生活方式相互作用对两种肥胖表型影响的模型,用于个性化制定不同宏量营养素分布的能量限制饮食处方。
Front Genet. 2019 Jul 30;10:686. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00686. eCollection 2019.
5
Prediction of Blood Lipid Phenotypes Using Obesity-Related Genetic Polymorphisms and Lifestyle Data in Subjects with Excessive Body Weight.利用肥胖相关基因多态性和生活方式数据预测超重受试者的血脂表型
Int J Genomics. 2018 Nov 19;2018:4283078. doi: 10.1155/2018/4283078. eCollection 2018.
6
Estimation of the risk of a qualitative phenotype: dependence on population risk.
J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb;62(2):191-198. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2016.106. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Constructing Hypothetical Risk Data from the Area under the ROC Curve: Modelling Distributions of Polygenic Risk.从ROC曲线下面积构建假设风险数据:多基因风险分布建模
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0152359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152359. eCollection 2016.
8
A genetic risk tool for obesity predisposition assessment and personalized nutrition implementation based on macronutrient intake.一种基于宏量营养素摄入量的肥胖易感性评估和个性化营养实施的遗传风险工具。
Genes Nutr. 2015 Jan;10(1):445. doi: 10.1007/s12263-014-0445-z. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
9
Estimating the predictive ability of genetic risk models in simulated data based on published results from genome-wide association studies.基于全基因组关联研究发表的结果,估计遗传风险模型在模拟数据中的预测能力。
Front Genet. 2014 Jun 13;5:179. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00179. eCollection 2014.
10
Genetic tests obtainable through pharmacies: the good, the bad, and the ugly.通过药店获得的基因检测:好坏参半。
Hum Genomics. 2013 Jul 8;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-7-17.

本文引用的文献

1
Sample size requirements to detect the effect of a group of genetic variants in case-control studies.病例对照研究中检测一组基因变异效应所需的样本量要求。
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008 Dec 3;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-5-24.
2
A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions.对用于评估健康风险和个性化健康干预措施的商业基因组图谱的科学依据进行批判性评估。
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Mar;82(3):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.020.
3
Cumulative association of five genetic variants with prostate cancer.五种基因变异与前列腺癌的累积关联。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):910-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa075819. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
4
Combining multiple serum tumor markers improves detection of stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.联合多种血清肿瘤标志物可提高I期上皮性卵巢癌的检测率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Dec;107(3):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.08.009. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
5
Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies.基于全基因组关联研究预测个体疾病遗传风险
Genome Res. 2007 Oct;17(10):1520-8. doi: 10.1101/gr.6665407. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
6
The impact of genotype frequencies on the clinical validity of genomic profiling for predicting common chronic diseases.基因型频率对用于预测常见慢性病的基因组分析临床有效性的影响。
Genet Med. 2007 Aug;9(8):528-35. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31812eece0.
7
The efficacy of combining several risk factors as a screening test.将多种风险因素结合作为一种筛查测试的效果。
J Med Screen. 2005;12(4):197-201. doi: 10.1258/096914105775220642.
8
A refinement to 'how many genes underlie the occurrence of common complex diseases in the population?'.
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;35(2):497; author reply 498. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi288. Epub 2005 Dec 14.
9
Graphical presentation of distributions of risk in screening.筛查中风险分布的图形展示。
J Med Screen. 2005;12(3):155-60. doi: 10.1258/0969141054855283.
10
An epidemiologic assessment of genomic profiling for measuring susceptibility to common diseases and targeting interventions.一项关于基因组分析用于评估常见疾病易感性及靶向干预的流行病学评估。
Genet Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):38-47. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000105751.71430.79.

基因组分析预测常见复杂疾病的判别准确性评估。

Evaluation of the discriminative accuracy of genomic profiling in the prediction of common complex diseases.

机构信息

Office of Minority Health and health Disparities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop E-67, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Apr;18(4):485-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.209. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1038/ejhg.2009.209
PMID:19935832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2987256/
Abstract

Genetic testing for susceptibility to common diseases based on a combination of genetic markers may be needed because the effect size associated with each genetic marker is small. Whether or not a genome profile based on a combination of markers could yield a useful test can be evaluated by assessing the discriminative accuracy. The authors present a simple method to calculate the clinical discriminative accuracy of a genomic profile when the relative risk and genotype frequency of each genotype are known. In addition, the clinical discriminative accuracy of a genetic test is presented for given values of the heritability and prevalence of the disease and for the population-attributable fraction of the combined genetic markers. For given values of relative risk and genotype frequency, the discriminative accuracy increases with increasing heritability but declines with increasing prevalence of the disease. For a given value of population-attributable fraction, the discriminative accuracy increases with increasing relative risks, but declines with increasing genotype frequency. On the basis of population-attributable fraction and estimates of heritability of disease, the number of risk genotypes required to have a reasonable clinical discriminative accuracy is much higher than the genome profiles available at present.

摘要

基于遗传标记组合的常见疾病易感性基因检测可能是必要的,因为与每个遗传标记相关的效应大小较小。可以通过评估判别准确性来评估基于标记组合的基因组图谱是否可以产生有用的测试。当已知每个基因型的相对风险和基因型频率时,作者提出了一种简单的方法来计算基因组图谱的临床判别准确性。此外,还针对疾病的遗传率和患病率以及组合遗传标记的人群归因分数的给定值,给出了遗传检测的临床判别准确性。对于给定的相对风险和基因型频率,判别准确性随遗传率的增加而增加,但随疾病患病率的增加而降低。对于给定的人群归因分数,判别准确性随相对风险的增加而增加,但随基因型频率的增加而降低。基于人群归因分数和疾病遗传率的估计,具有合理临床判别准确性所需的风险基因型数量远远高于目前可用的基因组图谱。