• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于遗传力解释水平评估遗传变异预测能力的统一框架。

A unifying framework for evaluating the predictive power of genetic variants based on the level of heritability explained.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

PLoS Genet. 2010 Dec 2;6(12):e1001230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001230.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001230
PMID:21151957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2996330/
Abstract

An increasing number of genetic variants have been identified for many complex diseases. However, it is controversial whether risk prediction based on genomic profiles will be useful clinically. Appropriate statistical measures to evaluate the performance of genetic risk prediction models are required. Previous studies have mainly focused on the use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, or AUC, to judge the predictive value of genetic tests. However, AUC has its limitations and should be complemented by other measures. In this study, we develop a novel unifying statistical framework that connects a large variety of predictive indices together. We showed that, given the overall disease probability and the level of variance in total liability (or heritability) explained by the genetic variants, we can estimate analytically a large variety of prediction metrics, for example the AUC, the mean risk difference between cases and non-cases, the net reclassification improvement (ability to reclassify people into high- and low-risk categories), the proportion of cases explained by a specific percentile of population at the highest risk, the variance of predicted risks, and the risk at any percentile. We also demonstrate how to construct graphs to visualize the performance of risk models, such as the ROC curve, the density of risks, and the predictiveness curve (disease risk plotted against risk percentile). The results from simulations match very well with our theoretical estimates. Finally we apply the methodology to nine complex diseases, evaluating the predictive power of genetic tests based on known susceptibility variants for each trait.

摘要

越来越多的遗传变异已被确定为许多复杂疾病的风险因素。然而,基于基因组图谱的风险预测在临床上是否有用还存在争议。需要适当的统计措施来评估遗传风险预测模型的性能。以前的研究主要集中在使用接收器操作特征 (ROC) 曲线下面积 (AUC) 来判断基因检测的预测价值。然而,AUC 有其局限性,应该用其他措施来补充。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种新的统一统计框架,将各种预测指标联系在一起。我们表明,给定总体疾病概率和遗传变异解释的总易感性(或遗传性)的方差水平,我们可以通过分析来估计各种预测指标,例如 AUC、病例与非病例之间的平均风险差异、净重新分类改善(将人们重新分类为高风险和低风险类别的能力)、特定百分比的人群在最高风险中的解释比例、预测风险的方差和任何百分位数的风险。我们还演示了如何构建图形来可视化风险模型的性能,例如 ROC 曲线、风险密度和预测性曲线(疾病风险与风险百分位数的关系)。模拟结果与我们的理论估计非常吻合。最后,我们将该方法应用于九种复杂疾病,评估基于每个特征的已知易感性变异的基因检测的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/3114d95b77de/pgen.1001230.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/d6c86ee6eb42/pgen.1001230.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/a97918e68339/pgen.1001230.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/bbd32e260360/pgen.1001230.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/5422f9f7bc6b/pgen.1001230.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/3114d95b77de/pgen.1001230.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/d6c86ee6eb42/pgen.1001230.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/a97918e68339/pgen.1001230.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/bbd32e260360/pgen.1001230.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/5422f9f7bc6b/pgen.1001230.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f78f/2996330/3114d95b77de/pgen.1001230.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A unifying framework for evaluating the predictive power of genetic variants based on the level of heritability explained.基于遗传力解释水平评估遗传变异预测能力的统一框架。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Dec 2;6(12):e1001230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001230.
2
The genetic interpretation of area under the ROC curve in genomic profiling.ROC 曲线下面积的基因组分析中的遗传解释。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Feb 26;6(2):e1000864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000864.
3
Evaluating the effect of multiple genetic risk score models on colorectal cancer risk prediction.评估多个遗传风险评分模型对结直肠癌风险预测的影响。
Gene. 2018 Oct 5;673:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
4
Bagging optimal ROC curve method for predictive genetic tests, with an application for rheumatoid arthritis.用于预测性基因检测的装袋优化ROC曲线方法及其在类风湿关节炎中的应用
J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Mar;20(2):401-14. doi: 10.1080/10543400903572811.
5
Value of genetic profiling for the prediction of coronary heart disease.基因谱分析在预测冠心病方面的价值。
Am Heart J. 2009 Jul;158(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.022.
6
Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.预测模型中新型标志物增量价值的图形评估:从统计学到决策分析视角
Biom J. 2015 Jul;57(4):556-70. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201300260. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
7
Determining Risk of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Based on Epidemiologic Factors and Genetic Variants.基于流行病学因素和基因变异确定巴雷特食管和食管腺癌的风险
Gastroenterology. 2018 Apr;154(5):1273-1281.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
A multi-locus predictiveness curve and its summary assessment for genetic risk prediction.多基因预测曲线及其对遗传风险预测的综合评估。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):44-56. doi: 10.1177/0962280218819202. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
[Genome-wide association study based risk prediction model in predicting lung cancer risk in Chinese].基于全基因组关联研究的风险预测模型在中国人群肺癌风险预测中的应用
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;36(10):1047-52.
10
Predictive testing for complex diseases using multiple genes: fact or fiction?使用多个基因对复杂疾病进行预测性检测:事实还是虚构?
Genet Med. 2006 Jul;8(7):395-400. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000229689.18263.f4.

引用本文的文献

1
ADuLT: An efficient and robust time-to-event GWAS.成人:一种高效稳健的事件时间 GWAS 分析方法。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 9;14(1):5553. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41210-z.
2
Accounting for age of onset and family history improves power in genome-wide association studies.考虑发病年龄和家族史可提高全基因组关联研究的效能。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar 3;109(3):417-432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
Analysis of genetic differences between psychiatric disorders: exploring pathways and cell types/tissues involved and ability to differentiate the disorders by polygenic scores.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the heritability explained by known susceptibility variants: a survey of ten complex diseases.评估已知易感变异解释的遗传率:十种复杂疾病的调查。
Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;35(5):310-7. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20579. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
2
Effect size measures in genetic association studies and age-conditional risk prediction.基因关联研究和年龄条件风险预测中的效应量测量
Hum Hered. 2010;70(3):205-18. doi: 10.1159/000319192. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
3
Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.常见遗传变异在乳腺癌风险模型中的表现。
精神障碍遗传差异分析:探索相关途径和细胞类型/组织,以及通过多基因评分区分这些障碍的能力。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 13;11(1):426. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01545-x.
4
Identifying individuals with high risk of Alzheimer's disease using polygenic risk scores.使用多基因风险评分识别阿尔茨海默病高危个体。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 23;12(1):4506. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24082-z.
5
Prediction of Early Childhood Caries Based on Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Using Neural Networks.基于神经网络的单核苷酸多态性预测幼儿龋病。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;12(4):462. doi: 10.3390/genes12040462.
6
Criteria for evaluating risk prediction of multiple outcomes.评估多种结局风险预测的标准。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3492-3510. doi: 10.1177/0962280220929039. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Development of risk prediction models for glioma based on genome-wide association study findings and comprehensive evaluation of predictive performances.基于全基因组关联研究结果开发神经胶质瘤风险预测模型并对预测性能进行综合评估。
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 28;9(9):8311-8325. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10882. eCollection 2018 Feb 2.
8
Predictive accuracy of combined genetic and environmental risk scores.基因与环境综合风险评分的预测准确性
Genet Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;42(1):4-19. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22092. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
9
Asymptotic distribution of ∆AUC, NRIs, and IDI based on theory of U-statistics.基于U统计量理论的ΔAUC、NRI和IDI的渐近分布。
Stat Med. 2017 Sep 20;36(21):3334-3360. doi: 10.1002/sim.7333. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Projected changes in climatic suitability for turtles by 2050 and 2070.预计到2050年和2070年海龟气候适宜性的变化。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Oct 5;6(21):7690-7705. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2492. eCollection 2016 Nov.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):986-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907727.
4
The genetic interpretation of area under the ROC curve in genomic profiling.ROC 曲线下面积的基因组分析中的遗传解释。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Feb 26;6(2):e1000864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000864.
5
Prediction and interaction in complex disease genetics: experience in type 1 diabetes.复杂疾病遗传学中的预测与相互作用:1型糖尿病的经验
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000540. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
6
Value of adding single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes to a breast cancer risk model.将单核苷酸多态性基因型纳入乳腺癌风险模型的价值。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jul 1;101(13):959-63. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp130. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
7
Beyond odds ratios--communicating disease risk based on genetic profiles.超越比值比——基于基因图谱传达疾病风险
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Apr;10(4):264-9. doi: 10.1038/nrg2516.
8
Interpretation of genetic association studies: markers with replicated highly significant odds ratios may be poor classifiers.基因关联研究的解读:具有重复出现的高度显著优势比的标记物可能是较差的分类指标。
PLoS Genet. 2009 Feb;5(2):e1000337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000337. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
9
Genome-based prediction of common diseases: advances and prospects.基于基因组的常见疾病预测:进展与展望
Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Oct 15;17(R2):R166-73. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn250.
10
Gauging the performance of SNPs, biomarkers, and clinical factors for predicting risk of breast cancer.评估单核苷酸多态性、生物标志物和临床因素在预测乳腺癌风险方面的性能。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jul 16;100(14):978-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn215. Epub 2008 Jul 8.