Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Womens Health Issues. 2010 Jan-Feb;20(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
To determine the cost effectiveness of the utilization of over-the-counter yeast infection detection kits in the diagnosis of vaginal candidiasis.
A cost-benefit analysis based on a group of 70 adult women from a previous prospective study who presented with vaginitis symptoms. By constructing two decision trees, one in which the kits are an option to the women and one in which they are not, we predict the cost for diagnosing vaginal candidiasis in this group of women.
For a group of 70 women presenting with vaginitis symptoms, the total cost of diagnosing their infections without the use of kits is predicted to be 7,051.10 dollars. For the same 70 women, the total of cost of diagnosing their infections with the use of kits is predicted to be 5,941.02 dollars.
We conclude that the use of yeast infection detection kits could reduce the cost of diagnosis by 16%. The introduction of kits could save patients the time, money, and other resources involved in visiting a physician to confirm the diagnosis. Moreover, the sensitivity of yeast kits is superior to the traditional wet mount (77% vs. 52%), so there may be a role for the kits in the physician's office as well.
确定在阴道念珠菌病诊断中使用非处方酵母感染检测试剂盒的成本效益。
基于先前前瞻性研究中 70 名成年女性的群体进行成本效益分析,这些女性出现阴道炎症状。通过构建两个决策树,一个是试剂盒可供女性选择的决策树,另一个是试剂盒不可用的决策树,我们预测了该组女性阴道念珠菌病的诊断成本。
对于一组出现阴道炎症状的 70 名女性,不使用试剂盒诊断其感染的总费用预计为 7051.10 美元。对于同一组 70 名女性,使用试剂盒诊断其感染的总成本预计为 5941.02 美元。
我们得出结论,使用酵母感染检测试剂盒可以降低 16%的诊断成本。试剂盒的引入可以为患者节省就诊以确认诊断所涉及的时间、金钱和其他资源。此外,酵母试剂盒的敏感性优于传统的湿片(77%比 52%),因此试剂盒在医生办公室也可能有一定的作用。