Science and Research Centre, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.
Gait Posture. 2010 Feb;31(2):261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-session reliability of a newly developed portable electronic balance measurement system (Clever Balance Board; CBB). In the first experiment, 36 male athletes performed three trials of the Sharpened-Romberg test, single limb stance test, and the CBB test in a randomized order. In the second experiment, eight physically active men and 12 women performed the CBB test in two sessions separated by 48 h. The first experiment revealed a large trial-to-trial improvement for the Sharpened-Romberg test (46%) and single limb stance test (21%), while the same effect was relatively small for the three CBB scores (5-7%). The second experiment revealed a minimal improvement in the CBB scores between two sessions (0.6-2.3%). The observed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV) suggested an acceptable retest correlation (ICC = 0.85 and 0.76), but very large within-individual variation (CV = 42.1% and 45.7%) of the Sharpened-Romberg test and the single limb stance test. Regarding the CBB scores, the corresponding retest correlation coefficients and within-individual variations were ICC = 0.90-0.96 and CV = 6.9-16.2%, respectively. Finally, inter-session reliability coefficients proved that the CBB scores had high retest correlation and an acceptable within-individual variation (ICC = 0.77-0.90 and CV = 8.4-13.9%). These results generally suggest that the CBB could be a reliable tool for dynamic balance assessment in healthy and physically active individuals.
本研究旨在评估一种新开发的便携式电子平衡测量系统(Clever Balance Board;CBB)的内-间测试可靠性。在第一个实验中,36 名男性运动员以随机顺序进行了三次锐化 Romberg 测试、单腿站立测试和 CBB 测试。在第二个实验中,8 名活跃男性和 12 名女性在 48 小时的间隔内进行了两次 CBB 测试。第一个实验显示锐化 Romberg 测试(46%)和单腿站立测试(21%)的每次测试之间都有很大的提高,而三个 CBB 分数的相同效果相对较小(5-7%)。第二个实验显示 CBB 分数在两次测试之间仅略有提高(0.6-2.3%)。观察到的组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV)表明,锐化 Romberg 测试和单腿站立测试的重测相关性(ICC = 0.85 和 0.76)可以接受,但个体内变异非常大(CV = 42.1% 和 45.7%)。关于 CBB 分数,相应的重测相关系数和个体内变异分别为 ICC = 0.90-0.96 和 CV = 6.9-16.2%。最后,组间可靠性系数证明 CBB 分数具有高重测相关性和可接受的个体内变异(ICC = 0.77-0.90 和 CV = 8.4-13.9%)。这些结果总体表明,CBB 可作为健康和活跃个体动态平衡评估的可靠工具。