Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):371-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.034. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
The lack of standardized reporting of the complications of radical prostatectomy in the literature has made it difficult to compare incidences across institutions and across different surgical approaches.
To define comprehensively the incidence, severity, and timing of onset of medical and surgical complications of open retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LP) using a standardized reporting methodology to facilitate comparison.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between January 1999 and June 2007, 4592 consecutive patients underwent RP or LP without prior radiation or hormonal therapy. Median follow-up was 36.9 mo (interquartile range: 20.3-60.6).
Open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
All medical and surgical complications of radical prostatectomy were captured and graded according to the modified Clavien classification and classified by timing of onset.
There were 612 medical complications in 467 patients (10.2%) and 1426 surgical complications in 925 patients (20.1%). The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for RP were 8.5% and 1.5% for medical and 11.4% and 4.9% for surgical complications, respectively. The overall incidences of early minor and major medical and surgical complications for LP were 14.2% and 2.3% for medical and 23.1% and 6.6% for surgical complications, respectively. On multivariate analysis, LP approach was associated with a higher incidence of any grade medical and surgical complications but a lower incidence of major surgical complications than RP. Six hundred fifty-two men (14.2%) visited the emergency department, and 240 men (5.2%) required readmission. The main limitation is the retrospective nature.
With standardized reporting, the incidence of some complications is higher than recognized in the literature. Although most complications are minor in severity, medical and surgical complications are observed in approximately 10% and 20% of patients, respectively. Accurate reporting of complications through a standardized methodology is essential for counseling patients regarding risk of complications, for identifying modifiable risk factors, and for facilitating comparison across institutions and approaches.
由于文献中缺乏根治性前列腺切除术并发症的标准化报告,因此难以在不同机构和不同手术方法之间比较发病率。
使用标准化报告方法全面定义开放式经耻骨后前列腺切除术(RP)和腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LP)的医疗和手术并发症的发生率、严重程度和发病时间,以方便比较。
设计、设置和参与者:1999 年 1 月至 2007 年 6 月期间,连续 4592 例患者接受了 RP 或 LP 治疗,术前未接受放疗或激素治疗。中位随访时间为 36.9 个月(四分位距:20.3-60.6)。
开放式或腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。
所有根治性前列腺切除术的医疗和手术并发症均按改良 Clavien 分级进行捕获和分级,并按发病时间分类。
467 例患者中有 612 例(10.2%)出现 612 例医疗并发症,925 例患者中有 1426 例(20.1%)出现 1426 例手术并发症。RP 的早期轻微和主要医疗和手术并发症的总体发生率分别为 8.5%和 1.5%的医疗并发症,以及 11.4%和 4.9%的手术并发症。LP 的早期轻微和主要医疗和手术并发症的总体发生率分别为 14.2%和 2.3%的医疗并发症,以及 23.1%和 6.6%的手术并发症。多变量分析显示,LP 方法与任何等级的医疗和手术并发症发生率较高相关,但与 RP 相比,严重手术并发症发生率较低。652 名男性(14.2%)到急诊室就诊,240 名男性(5.2%)需要再次入院。主要限制是回顾性研究。
通过标准化报告,一些并发症的发生率高于文献中报道的。尽管大多数并发症的严重程度较轻,但分别约有 10%和 20%的患者发生医疗和手术并发症。通过标准化方法准确报告并发症对于向患者咨询并发症风险、确定可改变的危险因素以及促进机构间和方法间的比较至关重要。