Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, WI 53141, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):515-27. doi: 10.1037/a0017085.
The structure and magnitude of sex differences in interpersonal problems across several data sets were examined, guided by the interpersonal circumplex model and the structural summary method. Data were self-reported interpersonal difficulties, assessed with the 64-item version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP; L. M. Horowitz, S. E. Rosenberg, B. A. Baer, G. Ureño, & V. S. Villaseñor, 1988). In Study 1, the authors focused on sex differences at the level of specific interpersonal complaints (item level). In Study 2, the authors examined sex differences in octant scores of the IIP circumplex (scale level), in a reanalysis of archival data. The structural summary method was used to identify points of maximum difference between men and women in the interpersonal continuum and to estimate effect sizes. Results from the 2 studies converged in suggesting a dimension of difference involving problems in Hostile-Dominance vs. Friendly-Submission. The magnitude of effect size was consistent with previous reports in the personality literature. These sex differences appeared to be best explained by a one-dimensional model. Findings were generally consistent across 3 different types of samples.
本研究采用人际圆模型和结构总结法,考察了几个数据集之间人际问题的性别差异的结构和大小。数据来源于自我报告的人际困难,使用人际问题清单(Inventory of Interpersonal Problems,IIP)的 64 项版本进行评估(L. M. Horowitz、S. E. Rosenberg、B. A. Baer、G. Ureño 和 V. S. Villaseñor,1988)。在研究 1 中,作者关注特定人际抱怨(项目水平)的性别差异。在研究 2 中,作者在对档案数据的重新分析中,考察了 IIP 环量表的八分位数(量表水平)的性别差异。结构总结法用于确定人际连续体中男女差异的最大点,并估计效应大小。这两项研究的结果一致表明,存在一个涉及敌对-支配与友好-服从问题的差异维度。效应大小的大小与人格文献中的先前报告一致。这些性别差异似乎可以通过一维模型得到最好的解释。研究结果在三种不同类型的样本中基本一致。