Health Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jan;96(1):78-84. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.163931. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
To evaluate the evidence on the transition process from child to adult services for young people with palliative care needs.
Systematic review.
Child and adult services and interface between healthcare providers.
Young people aged 13-24 years with palliative care conditions in the process of transition.
Young people and their families' experiences of transition, the process of transition between services and its impact on continuity of care and models of good practice.
92 studies included. Papers on transition services were of variable quality when applied to palliative care contexts. Most focussed on common life-threatening and life-limiting conditions. No standardised transition program identified and most guidelines used to develop transition services were not evidence-based. Most studies on transition programs were predominantly condition-specific (eg, cystic fibrosis (CF), cancer) services. CF services offered high-quality transition with the most robust empirical evaluation. There were differing condition-dependent viewpoints on when transition should occur but agreement on major principles guiding transition planning and probable barriers. There was evidence of poor continuity between child and adult providers with most originating from within child settings.
Palliative care was not, in itself, a useful concept for locating transition-related evidence. It is not possible to evaluate the merits of the various transition models for palliative care contexts, or their effects on continuity of care, as there are no long-term outcome data to measure their effectiveness. Use of validated outcome measures would facilitate research and service development.
评估有姑息治疗需求的年轻人从儿童服务向成人服务过渡过程的证据。
系统评价。
儿童和成人服务以及医疗保健提供者之间的接口。
处于过渡过程中的年龄在 13-24 岁之间、有姑息治疗条件的年轻人。
年轻人及其家人的过渡体验、服务之间的过渡过程及其对连续性护理的影响以及良好实践模式。
共纳入 92 项研究。当应用于姑息治疗环境时,关于过渡服务的论文质量存在差异。大多数研究集中在常见的危及生命和生命有限的条件上。没有确定标准化的过渡方案,大多数用于制定过渡服务的指南都不是基于证据的。大多数关于过渡计划的研究主要是针对特定疾病的(例如,囊性纤维化(CF)、癌症)服务。CF 服务提供了高质量的过渡,具有最可靠的实证评估。不同的疾病依赖于何时发生过渡的观点,但对指导过渡计划的主要原则和可能的障碍达成了一致。儿童和成人提供者之间存在连续性差的证据,大多数问题源自儿童环境。
姑息治疗本身并不是定位与过渡相关证据的有用概念。由于没有长期结果数据来衡量其有效性,因此无法评估姑息治疗环境中各种过渡模式的优点或它们对连续性护理的影响。使用经过验证的结果测量方法将有助于研究和服务开发。