Suppr超能文献

运动生理学虚拟实验室项目评估。

Evaluation of the Virtual Physiology of Exercise Laboratory program.

机构信息

Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Dec;33(4):335-42. doi: 10.1152/advan.00040.2009.

Abstract

The Virtual Physiology of Exercise Laboratory (VPEL) program was created to simulate the test design, data collection, and analysis phases of selected exercise physiology laboratories. The VPEL program consists of four modules: 1) cardiovascular, 2) maximal O(2) consumption (Vo(2max)), 3) lactate and ventilatory thresholds, and 4) respiratory exchange ratio. The purpose of this investigation was to compare student learning from the VPEL program with that from traditional "hands-on" exercise physiology laboratory activities. Student participants from the spring 2009 Integrated Fitness Programming course were randomly assigned to either experimental group 1 or group 2. Group 1 completed a hands-on version of a typical Vo(2max) laboratory activity, whereas group 2 completed the VPEL Vo(2max) module. Both groups then completed the same assessment to evaluate their understanding of Vo(2max) laboratory concepts. Group 1 then completed the VPEL lactate and ventilatory threshold module, whereas group 2 completed a hands-on version of that same activity. Both groups then completed the same assessment to evaluate their understanding of lactate and ventilatory threshold laboratory concepts. Mean Vo(2max) assessment scores were 86.39 +/- 4.13 and 85.64 +/- 6.72 and mean lactate and ventilatory threshold assessment scores were 85.50 +/- 8.05 and 86.15 +/- 6.45 for groups 1 and 2, respectively. These findings lend additional support to the following conclusion of similar investigations (2, 4, 6): that virtual laboratories instruct students as effectively as hands-on laboratories.

摘要

运动生理学虚拟实验室(VPEL)计划旨在模拟特定运动生理学实验室的测试设计、数据收集和分析阶段。VPEL 计划由四个模块组成:1)心血管,2)最大 O2 消耗(Vo2max),3)乳酸和通气阈,4)呼吸交换比。本研究的目的是比较学生从 VPEL 计划和传统的“动手”运动生理学实验室活动中获得的学习效果。2009 年春季综合健身计划课程的学生被随机分配到实验组 1 或实验组 2。实验组 1 完成了典型的 Vo2max 实验室活动的实际操作版本,而实验组 2 则完成了 VPEL Vo2max 模块。两组学生都完成了相同的评估,以评估他们对 Vo2max 实验室概念的理解。实验组 1 随后完成了 VPEL 乳酸和通气阈模块,而实验组 2 则完成了该活动的实际操作版本。两组学生都完成了相同的评估,以评估他们对乳酸和通气阈实验室概念的理解。实验组 1 和实验组 2 的平均 Vo2max 评估分数分别为 86.39 +/- 4.13 和 85.64 +/- 6.72,平均乳酸和通气阈评估分数分别为 85.50 +/- 8.05 和 86.15 +/- 6.45。这些发现进一步支持了以下类似研究(2、4、6)的结论:即虚拟实验室可以像实际实验室一样有效地指导学生。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验