• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机构归因和空间视角-taking。

Agency attribution and visuospatial perspective taking.

机构信息

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1089-93. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1089.

DOI:10.3758/PBR.16.6.1089
PMID:19966260
Abstract

We tested whether processes that evoke agency interpretations and mental state attributions also lead to adoption of the actor's visuospatial perspective by the observer. Agency and mental state interpretations were manipulated by showing different film clips involving two triangles (the Frith-Happé animations). Participants made speeded spatial decisions while watching these films. The responses in the spatial task could be either the same or different when given from the perspective of the participant versus the perspective of one of the triangles. Reaction times were longer when the perspectives of the participants and triangles differed than when they were the same. This effect increased as the need to invoke agency interpretations in order to understand the films increased, and it increased for those films that had previously been shown to evoke mental state attributions. This demonstrates that processing of an agent's behavior co-occurs with perspective adoption, even in the case in which triangles are the actors.

摘要

我们测试了唤起主体解释和心理状态归因的过程是否也会导致观察者采用行为者的空间视角。通过展示涉及两个三角形的不同电影片段(Frith-Happé 动画)来操纵主体和心理状态的解释。参与者在观看这些电影时进行快速的空间决策。参与者和三角形的视角相同时与不同时,空间任务的反应时间有所不同。当参与者和三角形的视角不同时,反应时间会更长。这种效应随着理解电影时需要唤起主体解释的程度而增加,并且对于之前被证明可以唤起心理状态归因的电影来说,这种效应也会增加。这表明,即使三角形是行为者,对行为者行为的处理也会与视角的采用同时发生。

相似文献

1
Agency attribution and visuospatial perspective taking.机构归因和空间视角-taking。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):1089-93. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1089.
2
Kinematics matters: a new eye-tracking investigation of animated triangles.运动学很重要:一项关于动画三角形的新眼动追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(2):229-44. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.704052. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
3
Do toddlers reason about other people's experiences of objects? A limit to early mental state reasoning.幼儿是否会推理他人对物体的体验?早期心理状态推理的局限性。
Cognition. 2024 May;246:105760. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105760. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
4
The extent of default visual perspective taking in complex layouts.在复杂布局中默认视觉视角采择的程度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Apr;42(4):508-16. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000164. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Second-order beliefs about intention and children's attributions of sociomoral judgment.关于意图的二阶信念与儿童的社会道德判断归因
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 May;97(1):44-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
6
Making sense of abstract events: building event schemas.理解抽象事件:构建事件图式。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1221-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03193267.
7
Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts.布局记忆的方向特异性与空间更新
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1051-63. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.6.1051.
8
Disturbances in the spontaneous attribution of social meaning in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中社会意义自发归因的障碍。
Psychol Med. 2009 Apr;39(4):635-43. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003838. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
9
Investigation of mentalizing and visuospatial perspective taking for self and other in Asperger syndrome.孤独症谱系障碍个体的心理理论和自我及他人视空间观点采择能力研究
J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Mar;40(3):290-9. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0867-4. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
10
The spatiotemporal distinctiveness of direct causation.直接因果关系的时空独特性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):729-35. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.729.

引用本文的文献

1
Both the domain-general and the mentalising processes affect visual perspective taking.两种一般领域和心理化过程都会影响视觉视角的选择。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):469-484. doi: 10.1177/17470218221094310. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
The kleineWeltentdecker App - A smartphone-based developmental diary.“kleineWeltentdecker 应用程序-基于智能手机的发育日记。”
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2522-2544. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01755-7. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
3
I Am Looking for Your Mind: Pupil Dilation Predicts Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Hints of Human-Likeness in Robot Behavior.

本文引用的文献

1
Animated triangles: an eye tracking investigation.动态三角形:一项眼动追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jun;62(6):1189-97. doi: 10.1080/17470210802384214. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
2
Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective-taking.具身认知与离身认知:空间视角采择
Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
3
Beyond Simulation-Theory and Theory-Theory: why social cognitive neuroscience should use its own concepts to study "theory of mind".超越模拟理论和理论论:为何社会认知神经科学应运用自身概念来研究“心理理论”
我在探寻你的思维:瞳孔扩张预示着个体对机器人行为中类人特征暗示敏感度的差异。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Jun 18;8:653537. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.653537. eCollection 2021.
4
Do People Regard Robots as Human-Like Social Partners? Evidence From Perspective-Taking in Spatial Descriptions.人们将机器人视为类人社交伙伴吗?来自空间描述中视角采择的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 5;11:578244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578244. eCollection 2020.
5
Taking Others' Perspectives Enhances Situation Awareness in the Smart Home Interface.从他人视角出发可增强智能家居界面中的情境意识。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02761. eCollection 2019.
6
Spatial perspective taking: Effects of social, directional, and interactive cues.空间视角-taking:社会、方向和互动线索的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):1031-1043. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00910-y.
7
Perceived Ownership of Avatars Influences Visual Perspective Taking.对虚拟化身的感知所有权会影响视觉视角采择。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 25;9:743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00743. eCollection 2018.
8
Social effects on reference frame selection.社会因素对参照系选择的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2339-2345. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1429-6.
9
Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social.作为意向性主体的机器人:运用神经科学方法使机器人显得更具社交性。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 4;8:1663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01663. eCollection 2017.
10
Effects of face and inanimate-object contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.面部和无生命物体情境对刺激-反应相容性的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):376-83. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0520-2.
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):266-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.019. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
4
How we predict what other people are going to do.我们如何预测其他人将会做什么。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 24;1079(1):36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
5
Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind?视觉视角任务需要心理理论吗?
Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 15;30(3):1059-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.026. Epub 2005 Dec 6.
6
Shared representations in body perception.身体感知中的共享表征。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Mar;121(3):317-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
7
How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy.我们如何感知他人的痛苦?洞察共情所涉及的神经过程的一扇窗口。
Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 1;24(3):771-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006.
8
Detecting agents.检测剂
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):549-59. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1237.
9
Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns.运动与思维:复杂意向运动模式感知与解读的功能成像研究
Neuroimage. 2000 Sep;12(3):314-25. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0612.