Strongin T S, Charlton S G
Samaritan Counseling Center of Albuquerque, NM.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 Jan;62(1):57-9.
Airsickness has long been identified as a flying training issue. The present study sought to assess its impact in an operational setting. During a monthly wing safety meeting, 88 B-1B and B-52H crewmembers completed the "B-1B Airsickness Research File" questionnaire. The questionnaire responses were analyzed using ANOVA, Chi-square median tests, and multiple regression analyses. The percent of flights in which airsickness was experienced was found to be a function of crew position but not of aircraft type or the interaction of crew position and aircraft type. The degree of in-flight incapacitation experienced, however, was significantly predicted by the combination of crew position, aircraft type, and the amount of experience flying in bombers. Pilots reported the least amount of incapacitation, as did crewmembers who flew the B-1B and crewmembers with less bomber experience. Airsickness was reported to be a frequent occurrence among non-pilots in both aircraft. Experienced crewmembers were more likely to report an impact on their duties.
晕机长期以来一直被视为飞行训练中的一个问题。本研究旨在评估其在实际飞行中的影响。在每月一次的联队安全会议上，88名B - 1B和B - 52H机组人员完成了“B - 1B晕机研究档案”问卷。使用方差分析、卡方中位数检验和多元回归分析对问卷回复进行了分析。发现经历晕机的飞行百分比是机组人员位置的函数，而不是飞机类型或机组人员位置与飞机类型相互作用的函数。然而，飞行中丧失工作能力的程度可通过机组人员位置、飞机类型以及轰炸机飞行经验的多少显著预测。飞行员报告的丧失工作能力程度最低，驾驶B - 1B的机组人员以及轰炸机飞行经验较少的机组人员也是如此。据报告，两种飞机上的非飞行员中晕机情况很常见。经验丰富的机组人员更有可能报告晕机对其职责有影响。
