State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Mar;75(3):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.11.007. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
The adult brain shows remarkable plasticity, as demonstrated by the improvement in most visual discrimination tasks after intensive practice. However, previous studies have demonstrated that practice improved the discrimination only around oblique orientations, while performance around cardinal orientations (vertical or horizontal orientations) remained stable despite extensive training. The two experiments described here used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the neural substrates underlying different training effects in the two kinds of orientation. Event-related potentials were recorded from subjects when they were trained with a grating orientation discrimination task. Psychophysical threshold measurements were performed before and after the training. For oblique gratings, psychophysical thresholds decreased significantly across training sessions. ERPs showed larger P2 and P3 amplitudes and smaller N1 amplitudes over the parietal/occipital areas with more practice. In line with the psychophysical thresholds, the training effect on the P2 and P3 was specific to stimulus orientation. However, the N1 effect was generalized over differently oriented gratings stimuli. For cardinally oriented gratings, no significant changes were found in the psychophysical thresholds during the training. ERPs still showed similar generalized N1 effect as the oblique gratings. However, the amplitudes of P2 and P3 were unchanged during the whole training. Compared with cardinal orientations, more visual processing stages and later ERP components were involved in the training of oblique orientation discrimination. These results contribute to understanding the neural basis of the asymmetry between cardinal and oblique orientation training effects.
成人的大脑具有显著的可塑性,这一点在经过密集练习后大多数视觉辨别任务的改善中得到了证明。然而,先前的研究表明,练习仅改善了斜向方位的辨别能力,而尽管经过了广泛的训练,主方位(垂直或水平方位)的表现仍然稳定。这里描述的两个实验使用事件相关电位(ERPs)来研究两种方位的不同训练效果的神经基础。当被试进行光栅方位辨别任务的训练时,记录他们的事件相关电位。在训练前后进行心理物理阈值测量。对于斜向光栅,心理物理阈值在整个训练过程中显著降低。ERP 在顶枕区显示出更大的 P2 和 P3 振幅和更小的 N1 振幅,随着练习的增加。与心理物理阈值一致,P2 和 P3 的训练效果特定于刺激方位。然而,N1 效应是针对不同方位的光栅刺激的泛化。对于主向光栅,在训练过程中,心理物理阈值没有明显变化。ERP 仍然显示出与斜向光栅相似的泛化 N1 效应。然而,P2 和 P3 的振幅在整个训练过程中保持不变。与主方位相比,斜向方位辨别训练涉及更多的视觉处理阶段和更晚的 ERP 成分。这些结果有助于理解主方位和斜向方位训练效果之间不对称的神经基础。