Emanuel L L, Barry M J, Stoeckle J D, Ettelson L M, Emanuel E J
General Internal Medicine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):889-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241305.
BACKGROUND. Advance directives for medical care and the designation of proxy decision makers to guide medical care after a patient has become incompetent have been widely advocated but little studied. We investigated the attitudes of patients toward planning, perceived barriers to such planning, treatment preferences in four hypothetical scenarios, and the feasibility of using a particular document (the Medical Directive) in the outpatient setting to specify advance directives.
We surveyed 405 outpatients of 30 primary care physicians at Massachusetts General Hospital and 102 members of the general public in Boston and asked them as part of the survey to complete the Medical Directive.
Advance directives were desired by 93 percent of the outpatients and 89 percent of the members of the general public (P greater than 0.2). Both the young and the healthy subgroups expressed at least as much interest in planning as those older than 65 and those in fair-to-poor health. Of the perceived barriers to issuing advance directives, the lack of physician initiative was among the most frequently mentioned, and the disturbing nature of the topic was among the least. The outpatients refused life-sustaining treatments in 71 percent of their responses to options in the four scenarios (coma with chance of recovery, 57 percent; persistent vegetative state, 85 percent; dementia, 79 percent; and dementia with a terminal illness, 87 percent), with small differences between widely differing types of treatments. Specific treatment preferences could not be usefully predicted according to age, self-rated state of health, or other demographic features. Completing the Medical Directive took a median of 14 minutes.
When people are asked to imagine themselves incompetent with a poor prognosis, they decide against life-sustaining treatments about 70 percent of the time. Health, age, or other demographic features cannot be used, however, to predict specific preferences. Advance directives as part of a comprehensive approach such as that provided by the Medical Directive are desired by most people, require physician initiative, and can be achieved during a regular office visit.
背景。医疗预先指示以及指定代理人决策者以在患者丧失行为能力后指导医疗护理,已得到广泛倡导,但相关研究较少。我们调查了患者对规划的态度、此类规划的感知障碍、四种假设情景下的治疗偏好,以及在门诊环境中使用特定文件(《医疗指示》)来指定预先指示的可行性。
我们对马萨诸塞州总医院30名初级保健医生的405名门诊患者以及波士顿的102名普通公众进行了调查,并在调查中要求他们填写《医疗指示》。
93%的门诊患者和89%的普通公众希望制定预先指示(P大于0.2)。年轻和健康亚组对规划的兴趣至少与65岁以上及健康状况一般至较差的人群一样高。在预先指示发布的感知障碍中,医生缺乏主动性是最常被提及的,而该话题令人不安的性质是最不常被提及的。门诊患者在对四种情景选项的回复中,71%拒绝维持生命的治疗(有恢复机会的昏迷,57%;持续性植物状态,85%;痴呆,79%;以及伴有绝症的痴呆,87%),不同类型治疗之间差异不大。无法根据年龄、自我评估的健康状况或其他人口统计学特征有效地预测具体的治疗偏好。填写《医疗指示》的中位数时间为14分钟。
当人们被要求想象自己预后不佳且无行为能力时,他们约70%的情况下会决定拒绝维持生命的治疗。然而,健康状况、年龄或其他人口统计学特征无法用于预测具体偏好。大多数人希望将预先指示作为一种全面方法(如《医疗指示》所提供的方法)的一部分,这需要医生的主动性,并且可以在常规门诊就诊期间完成。