Suppr超能文献

一种自动化微流控免疫分析技术(BioIC,芯片实验室)与免疫CAP分析的比较。芯片实验室作为特异性IgE(sIgE)检测的工具。

Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection.

作者信息

Szymczak-Pajor Izabela, Pawliczak Rafal

机构信息

Department of Immunopathology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020 Feb;37(1):56-60. doi: 10.5114/ada.2020.93383. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The measurement of clinically important specific IgE (sIgE) antibody is pivotal for both diagnosis and management of allergy. Two methods may be distinguished depending on the number of antigens tested simultaneously: singleplex and multiplex. BioIC is a multiplex, advanced, automated microfluidic immunoassay system enabling simultaneous sIgE measurement against multiple allergens. ImmunoCAP is a singleplex assay for sIgE detection and gold standard method for diagnosis of allergy.

AIM

To compare and validate the diagnostic capability of a multiplex sIgE assay - BioIC assay with a singleplex ImmunoCAP assay.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using both BioIC assay and ImmunoCAP assay, the sIgE level in serum samples from 20 allergic disease patients with respect to 33 allergens (16 inhalant allergens, 16 food allergens and 1 contact allergen) was measured. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), qualitative and semi-quantitative comparisons were performed to compare both sIgE measurement methods using statistical analyses.

RESULTS

ROC AUC analysis showed similar sensitivity and specificity of BioIC assay and ImmunoCAP assay. In qualitative analysis, the negative and positive agreements were 100% equal for each allergen. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients identified very high positive correlations between two assays for all tested allergens ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The BioIC showed agreement with ImmunoCAP assay. Sensitivity and specificity of both assays are similar, thus they showed similar diagnostic performance. However, careful interpretation of obtained results is necessary in clinical applications because of methodological differences between these two systems.

摘要

引言

临床上重要的特异性IgE(sIgE)抗体的检测对于过敏症的诊断和管理至关重要。根据同时检测的抗原数量可区分两种方法:单plex和多plex。BioIC是一种多plex、先进的自动化微流免疫分析系统,能够同时针对多种过敏原进行sIgE检测。ImmunoCAP是一种用于sIgE检测的单plex分析方法,也是过敏症诊断的金标准方法。

目的

比较并验证多plex sIgE检测方法——BioIC检测法与单plex ImmunoCAP检测法的诊断能力。

材料与方法

使用BioIC检测法和ImmunoCAP检测法,测量了20例过敏性疾病患者血清样本中针对33种过敏原(16种吸入性过敏原、16种食物过敏原和1种接触性过敏原)的sIgE水平。采用统计分析进行受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)、定性和半定量比较,以比较两种sIgE检测方法。

结果

ROC AUC分析显示BioIC检测法和ImmunoCAP检测法具有相似的敏感性和特异性。在定性分析中,每种过敏原的阴性和阳性一致性均为100%相等。Spearman等级相关系数表明,两种检测方法对所有测试过敏原之间均存在非常高的正相关性(<0.001)。

结论

BioIC检测法与ImmunoCAP检测法具有一致性。两种检测方法的敏感性和特异性相似,因此它们显示出相似的诊断性能。然而,由于这两种系统在方法上存在差异,在临床应用中对所得结果进行仔细解读是必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验