• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机械搅拌和两种洗必泰制剂对生物膜细菌的协同抗菌作用。

The synergistic antimicrobial effect by mechanical agitation and two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria.

机构信息

Division of Endodontics, Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Endod. 2010 Jan;36(1):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.018.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.018
PMID:20003944
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Irrigation of the root canal with antibacterial solutions is considered an essential part of root canal treatment in endodontics. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether mechanical agitation (ultrasonic or sonic) improves the effectiveness of chlorhexidine against biofilm bacteria in vitro.

METHODS

Collagen-coated hydroxyapatite (CHA) disks were exposed to dispersed subgingival plaque for 3 weeks at 37 degrees C. The multispecies biofilms established were subjected for 1 and 3 minutes to CHX-Plus (Vista Dental Products, Racine, WI) and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), with or without mechanical agitation. After treatment, the amount of dead bacteria in biofilms was analyzed by viability staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The morphology of biofilms, with or without mechanical agitation, was also examined by CLSM.

RESULTS

The structure of the biofilm did not show any obvious change when the solutions surrounding the biofilm were exposed to continuous ultrasonic or sonic agitation. The combined use of mechanical agitation and chlorhexidine had a more pronounced antimicrobial effect against the biofilms than either one alone. Sonic activation (EndoActivator; Advanced Endodontics, Santa Barbara, CA) showed the highest levels of bactericidal activity with CHX-Plus after both exposure times. The proportion of killed bacteria also depended on the type of irrigant (p < 0.001) and the time of exposure (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The low-intensity ultrasonic or sonic agitation that does not disrupt biofilm or disperse the biofilm bacteria improves the action of disinfectants against biofilm bacteria.

摘要

简介

在牙髓学中,根管冲洗被认为是根管治疗的重要组成部分。本研究旨在探讨机械搅拌(超声或声流)是否能提高洗必泰对体外生物膜细菌的效果。

方法

胶原涂层羟基磷灰石(CHA)盘在 37 度下暴露于分散的龈下菌斑中 3 周。建立的多菌种生物膜在 CHX-Plus(Vista Dental Products,Racine,WI)和 2%洗必泰(CHX)中分别进行 1 分钟和 3 分钟的处理,有或没有机械搅拌。处理后,通过活菌染色和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)分析生物膜中死菌的数量。还用 CLSM 检查有无机械搅拌时生物膜的形态。

结果

当生物膜周围的溶液暴露于连续的超声或声流时,生物膜的结构没有明显变化。机械搅拌与洗必泰联合使用对生物膜的抗菌效果比单独使用任何一种都更明显。在两种暴露时间后,与 CHX-Plus 联合使用时,声流激活(EndoActivator;Advanced Endodontics,Santa Barbara,CA)显示出最高的杀菌活性。被杀灭的细菌比例也取决于冲洗剂的类型(p<0.001)和暴露时间(p<0.001)。

结论

不会破坏生物膜或分散生物膜细菌的低强度超声或声流可增强消毒剂对生物膜细菌的作用。

相似文献

1
The synergistic antimicrobial effect by mechanical agitation and two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria.机械搅拌和两种洗必泰制剂对生物膜细菌的协同抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2010 Jan;36(1):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.018.
2
Evaluation of the effect of two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria in vitro: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis.两种洗必泰制剂对体外生物膜细菌作用的评估:三维定量分析
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):981-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.030.
3
Synergistic effect of microbubble emulsion and sonic or ultrasonic agitation on endodontic biofilm in vitro.微泡乳液与声或超声搅拌协同作用对体外根管生物膜的影响。
J Endod. 2012 Nov;38(11):1530-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
4
Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a novel irrigant, QMiX.新型冲洗液 QMiX 的抗菌和去除玷污层能力。
Int Endod J. 2012 Apr;45(4):363-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01985.x. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
5
Effectiveness of endodontic disinfecting solutions against young and old Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals.根管消毒溶液对牙本质管内新旧粪肠球菌生物膜的有效性。
J Endod. 2012 Oct;38(10):1376-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.035. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
6
The effect of detergents on the antibacterial activity of disinfecting solutions in dentin.清洁剂对牙本质中消毒剂抗菌活性的影响。
J Endod. 2012 Jul;38(7):948-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
7
Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine against bacteria in biofilms at different stages of development.洗必泰对不同发育阶段生物膜细菌的抗菌效果。
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):657-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
8
In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against selected single-species biofilms.次氯酸钠和洗必泰对选定单菌种生物膜的体外抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2006 Nov;39(11):878-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01161.x.
9
Effect of modified nonequilibrium plasma with chlorhexidine digluconate against endodontic biofilms in vitro.含葡萄糖酸洗必泰的改良非平衡等离子体对根管生物膜的体外作用
J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.027. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
10
Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of biofilm maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to antibacterial agents.生物膜细菌来源、生物膜成熟度水平和消毒剂类型对抗菌药物敏感性的影响。
J Endod. 2013 Apr;39(4):473-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.024. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of treatment of methicillin-resistant biofilms with intermittent electrochemically generated HO or HOCl.评估间歇电化学产生的 HO 或 HOCl 对耐甲氧西林生物膜的治疗作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Jul 9;68(7):e0172223. doi: 10.1128/aac.01722-23. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Evaluation of Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Biofilms with Intermittent Electrochemically-Generated HO or HOCl.间歇性电化学生成的HO或HOCl对耐甲氧西林生物膜的治疗效果评估
bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 27:2024.03.22.586337. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.22.586337.
3
Differential expression of circular RNAs in interleukin 6-promoted osteogenic differentiation of human stem cells from apical papilla.
白细胞介素 6 促进根尖乳头干细胞成骨分化过程中环状 RNA 的差异表达。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec;27(12):7765-7776. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05366-8. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of ultrasonics in endodontic treatment: A Survey among general practitioners and endodontists.超声在牙髓病治疗中的知识、态度和实践:全科医生和牙髓病专家的一项调查。
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S173-S176. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_242_22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Biofilm in Endodontics: In Vitro Cultivation Possibilities, Sonic-, Ultrasonic- and Laser-Assisted Removal Techniques and Evaluation of the Cleaning Efficacy.牙髓病学中的生物膜:体外培养可能性、声波、超声和激光辅助清除技术以及清洁效果评估
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;14(7):1334. doi: 10.3390/polym14071334.
6
A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study irrigants and irrigation systems.对研究方法和实验模型进行批判性分析,以研究冲洗液和冲洗系统。
Int Endod J. 2022 Apr;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):295-329. doi: 10.1111/iej.13710. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
7
Role of microalgal metabolites in controlling quorum-sensing-regulated biofilm.微藻代谢产物在调控群体感应调节生物膜中的作用。
Arch Microbiol. 2022 Feb 4;204(3):163. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-02776-2.
8
Combined an acoustic pressure simulation of ultrasonic radiation and experimental studies to evaluate control efficacy of high-intensity ultrasound against Staphylococcus aureus biofilm.联合超声辐射声压模拟和实验研究评估高强度超声对抗金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的控制效果。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2021 Nov;79:105764. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105764. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
9
Filling the Void: An Optimized Polymicrobial Interkingdom Biofilm Model for Assessing Novel Antimicrobial Agents in Endodontic Infection.填补空白:一种用于评估牙髓感染中新型抗菌剂的优化多微生物跨界生物膜模型
Microorganisms. 2020 Dec 14;8(12):1988. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121988.
10
Dynamics of Dissolution, Killing, and Inhibition of Dental Plaque Biofilm.牙菌斑生物膜的溶解、杀灭及抑制动力学
Front Microbiol. 2020 May 20;11:964. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00964. eCollection 2020.