Centre for Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain Injury and Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 May;47(5):604-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.013. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
Disability due to back pain in nurses results in reduced productivity, work absenteeism and attrition from the nursing workforce internationally. Consistent use of outcome measures is needed in intervention studies to enable meta-analyses that determine efficacy of back pain preventive programs.
This study investigated the psychometric and measurement properties of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in nursing students to determine its suitability for assessing back pain related disability in intervention studies.
Bachelor of Nursing students were recruited. Test-retest reliability and the ability of the ODI to discriminate between individuals with serious and non-serious back pain were investigated. The measurement error of the ODI was examined with the minimal detectable change at the 90% confidence level (MDC(90)).
Student nurses (n=214) had a low mean ODI score of 8.8+/-7.4%. Participants with serious back pain recorded higher scores than the rest of the cohort (p<0.05). Test-retest reliability examined in 33 individuals was ICC=0.88 (95%CI 0.77-0.94). The MDC(90)=6%, and 36% of nursing students scored below the MDC(90) indicating the tool had limited ability to detect longitudinal change in disability in this population.
Data from this and previous studies demonstrate that the measurement properties of the ODI are inappropriate for studying back pain related disability in nurses. The ODI is not recommended for back pain intervention studies in the nursing population and an alternative tool that is sensitive to lower levels of disability must be determined.
护士因背痛导致的残疾会降低国际间护理劳动力的生产力、旷工和离职率。干预研究中需要一致使用结果测量方法,以进行荟萃分析,确定背痛预防计划的疗效。
本研究旨在调查护理学生的 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)的心理测量学和测量特性,以确定其在干预研究中评估与背痛相关残疾的适用性。
招募了护理专业的学生。研究了 ODI 的重测信度和区分严重和非严重背痛个体的能力。使用 90%置信水平的最小可检测变化(MDC(90))检查 ODI 的测量误差。
学生护士的平均 ODI 评分为 8.8±7.4%,得分较低。患有严重背痛的参与者的得分高于队列中的其余人(p<0.05)。在 33 名个体中进行的重测信度检查的 ICC 为 0.88(95%CI 0.77-0.94)。MDC(90)=6%,36%的护理学生的得分低于 MDC(90),表明该工具在检测该人群残疾的纵向变化方面能力有限。
本研究和先前研究的数据表明,ODI 的测量特性不适合研究护士的背痛相关残疾。ODI 不建议用于护理人群的背痛干预研究,必须确定对较低残疾水平敏感的替代工具。