Blair S N, Dowda M, Pate R R, Kronenfeld J, Howe H G, Parker G, Blair A, Fridinger F
Institute for Aerobics Research, Dallas, TX 75230.
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Feb 1;133(3):266-75. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115871.
The reliability of long-term recall of physical activity participation was examined in 322 women and 129 men in a worksite health study conducted at the Liberty Corporation, Greenville, South Carolina during 1976-1987. Leisure time physical activity was assessed at baseline; and energy expenditure in total, light, moderate, and vigorous activities was calculated. The long-term recall of baseline activities was determined 1-10 years after the examination. The relation between actual baseline and recalled activity was positive and in most cases the coefficients were statistically significant at p less than 0.05. The correlations were modest, most in the range of 0.20 to 0.50. Percent agreement between baseline and recalled activity generally ranged from 60 to 75%. Multiple regression analyses suggested that recalled activity was a significant predictor of baseline activity, but recall interval and age were not important contributors to the regression model. R2 values for the model were 0.10 for light activity and 0.26 for vigorous activity. Questionnaire assessment of long-term physical activity recall appeared to be reliable, length of recall interval up to 10 years was not an important factor, and recall of vigorous activity was more accurate than for less intensive activities.
在1976年至1987年于南卡罗来纳州格林维尔市利伯蒂公司开展的一项工作场所健康研究中,对322名女性和129名男性的体育活动参与情况长期回忆的可靠性进行了检验。在基线时评估休闲时间的体育活动;并计算了总活动、轻度活动、中度活动和剧烈活动中的能量消耗。在检查后1至10年确定对基线活动的长期回忆情况。实际基线活动与回忆活动之间的关系呈正相关,在大多数情况下,系数在p小于0.05时具有统计学意义。相关性适中,大多在0.20至0.50范围内。基线活动与回忆活动之间的一致百分比一般在60%至75%之间。多元回归分析表明,回忆活动是基线活动的重要预测指标,但回忆间隔和年龄并非回归模型的重要影响因素。该模型的R2值,轻度活动为0.10,剧烈活动为0.26。对长期体育活动回忆的问卷评估似乎是可靠的,长达10年的回忆间隔长度不是一个重要因素,对剧烈活动的回忆比对强度较小活动的回忆更准确。