• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Nature-Nurture Debate and Public Policy.先天与后天之争与公共政策
Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press). 2004 Oct 1;50(4):418-427. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2004.0028.
2
Brain development and the nature versus nurture debate.大脑发育与先天与后天之争。
Prog Brain Res. 2011;189:3-22. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53884-0.00015-4.
3
The nature of nurture: Darwinian and mendelian perspectives.后天培养的本质:达尔文主义与孟德尔主义视角
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Dec;36(5):2197-2206. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424000166. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
4
Why nature prevails over nurture in the making of the elite athlete.为什么自然因素胜过教养因素造就了精英运动员。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Nov 14;18(Suppl 8):835. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4190-8.
5
Nature versus Nurture in Determining Athletic Ability.先天与后天因素对运动能力的影响
Med Sport Sci. 2016;61:15-28. doi: 10.1159/000445238. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
6
Nature-versus-nurture considered harmful: Actionability as an alternative tool for understanding the exposome from an ethical perspective.从伦理角度看,先天与后天之争有害无益:可操作性是从另一个角度理解外显子组的工具。
Bioethics. 2024 May;38(4):356-366. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13276. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
7
The Nature-Nurture Debates: 25 Years of Challenges in Understanding the Psychology of Gender.《先天-后天之争:理解性别心理学的 25 年挑战》
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):340-57. doi: 10.1177/1745691613484767.
8
Measured Gene-Environment Interactions in Psychopathology: Concepts, Research Strategies, and Implications for Research, Intervention, and Public Understanding of Genetics.精神病理学中的测量基因-环境交互作用:概念、研究策略,以及对遗传学研究、干预和公众理解的影响。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;1(1):5-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00002.x.
9
[Influence of home nurture environment on language development and social emotion in children with developmental language disorder].[家庭养育环境对发育性语言障碍儿童语言发展及社会情感的影响]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May;19(5):555-559. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.05.015.
10
Integrating nature and nurture: implications of person-environment correlations and interactions for developmental psychopathology.整合先天与后天:个人与环境的相关性及相互作用对发展性精神病理学的影响
Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Spring;9(2):335-64. doi: 10.1017/s0954579497002083.

引用本文的文献

1
Genes, environment and sport performance: why the nature-nurture dualism is no longer relevant.基因、环境与运动表现:为何先天与后天二元论已不再适用。
Sports Med. 2007;37(11):961-80. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737110-00004.
2
Translational science in action: hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems.实践中的转化科学:敌意归因风格与攻击性行为问题的发展
Dev Psychopathol. 2006 Summer;18(3):791-814. doi: 10.1017/s0954579406060391.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of Home and School Behavior Problems in Rural and Urban Settings.农村和城市环境中家庭及学校行为问题模式
J Sch Psychol. 1998 Apr 1;36(1):45-58. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4405(97)00049-6.
2
Nature X nurture: genetic vulnerabilities interact with physical maltreatment to promote conduct problems.先天与后天:基因易感性与身体虐待相互作用,引发行为问题。
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Winter;17(1):67-84. doi: 10.1017/s0954579405050042.
3
Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy?父亲缺席是否会使女儿面临过早进行性活动和少女怀孕的特殊风险?
Child Dev. 2003 May-Jun;74(3):801-21. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00569.
4
Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children.儿童攻击性行为问题发展中的同伴排斥与社会信息加工因素
Child Dev. 2003 Mar-Apr;74(2):374-93. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.7402004.
5
A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence.青少年慢性行为问题发展的生物心理社会模型。
Dev Psychol. 2003 Mar;39(2):349-71. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.39.2.349.
6
Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children.基因型在受虐待儿童暴力循环中的作用。
Science. 2002 Aug 2;297(5582):851-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1072290.
7
Developmental traumatology: the psychobiological development of maltreated children and its implications for research, treatment, and policy.发育创伤学:受虐儿童的心理生物学发展及其对研究、治疗和政策的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2001 Summer;13(3):539-64. doi: 10.1017/s0954579401003078.
8
P3b reflects maltreated children's reactions to facial displays of emotion.P3b反映了受虐待儿童对情绪面部表情的反应。
Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):267-74.
9
The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression.男孩反应性和主动性攻击中社会信息加工的二元性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;80(2):268-80. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.268.
10
Implications of the restricted range of family environments for estimates of heritability and nonshared environment in behavior-genetic adoption studies.行为遗传学收养研究中家庭环境范围受限对遗传率估计和非共享环境的影响。
Psychol Bull. 1999 Jul;125(4):392-409. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.392.

先天与后天之争与公共政策

The Nature-Nurture Debate and Public Policy.

作者信息

Dodge Kenneth A

机构信息

Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University.

出版信息

Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press). 2004 Oct 1;50(4):418-427. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2004.0028.

DOI:10.1353/mpq.2004.0028
PMID:20011615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2790282/
Abstract

The contentious nature-nurture debate in developmental psychology is poised to reach a rapprochement with contemporary concepts of gene-environment interaction, transaction, and fit. Discoveries over the past decade have revealed how neither genes nor the environment offers a sufficient window into human development. Rather, the most important discoveries have come from unearthing the manner in which the environment alters gene expression (and how genes impose limits on environmental effects), how biology and the environment influence each other across time, and how maximizing gene-environment fit leads to optimal outcomes for children. The manner in which these factors operate in tandem should direct future scholarship, practice, and public policy.

摘要

发展心理学中关于天性与教养的争论一直备受争议,如今有望与基因-环境相互作用、相互影响及适配的当代概念达成和解。过去十年的研究发现揭示了基因和环境都无法为人类发展提供充分的视角。相反,最重要的发现来自于揭示环境改变基因表达的方式(以及基因如何对环境影响施加限制)、生物学和环境如何随时间相互影响,以及基因-环境适配度最大化如何为儿童带来最佳结果。这些因素协同运作的方式应指导未来的学术研究、实践和公共政策。