Suppr超能文献

动物和家具物品会在人类婴儿大脑中引发不同的反应吗?

Do animals and furniture items elicit different brain responses in human infants?

作者信息

Jeschonek Susanna, Marinovic Vesna, Hoehl Stefanie, Elsner Birgit, Pauen Sabina

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Hauptstrasse 47-51, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Dev. 2010 Nov;32(10):863-71. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2009.11.010. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

Abstract

One of the earliest categorical distinctions to be made by preverbal infants is the animate-inanimate distinction. To explore the neural basis for this distinction in 7-8-month-olds, an equal number of animal and furniture pictures was presented in an ERP-paradigm. The total of 118 pictures, all looking different from each other, were presented in a semi-randomized order for 1000ms each. Infants' brain responses to exemplars from both categories differed systematically regarding the negative central component (Nc: 400-600ms) at anterior channels. More specifically, the Nc was enhanced for animals in one subgroup of infants, and for furniture items in another subgroup of infants. Explorative analyses related to categorical priming further revealed category-specific differences in brain responses in the late time window (650-1550ms) at right frontal channels: Unprimed stimuli (preceded by a different-category item) elicited a more positive response as compared to primed stimuli (preceded by a same-category item). In sum, these findings suggest that the infant's brain discriminates exemplars from both global domains. Given the design of our task, we conclude that processes of category identification are more likely to account for our findings than processes of on-line category formation during the experimental session.

摘要

言语前婴儿最早做出的分类区分之一是有生命与无生命的区分。为了探究7至8个月大婴儿做出这种区分的神经基础,在一个事件相关电位(ERP)范式中呈现了数量相等的动物和家具图片。总共118张图片,每张看起来都彼此不同,以半随机顺序呈现,每张呈现1000毫秒。婴儿大脑对这两类样本的反应在前部通道的负中央成分(Nc:400 - 600毫秒)方面存在系统性差异。更具体地说,在一组婴儿中,动物图片使Nc增强,而在另一组婴儿中,家具图片使Nc增强。与分类启动相关的探索性分析进一步揭示了右额部通道在较晚时间窗口(650 - 1550毫秒)大脑反应中的类别特异性差异:未启动刺激(由不同类别项目前置)与启动刺激(由相同类别项目前置)相比,引发了更积极的反应。总之,这些发现表明婴儿大脑能够区分来自两个总体领域的样本。鉴于我们任务的设计,我们得出结论,与实验过程中的在线类别形成过程相比,类别识别过程更有可能解释我们的发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验