GREQAM, Université Paul Cézanne, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, et Institut Universitaire de France, Aix-Marseille III, France.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jan 27;365(1538):303-17. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0192.
Empathy is a longstanding issue in economics, especially for welfare economics, but one which has faded from the scene in recent years. However, with the rise of neuroeconomics, there is now a renewed interest in this subject. Some economists have even gone so far as to suggest that neuroscientific experiments reveal heterogeneous empathy levels across individuals. If this were the case, this would be in line with economists' usual assumption of stable and given preferences and would greatly facilitate the study of prosocial behaviour with which empathy is often associated. After reviewing some neuroscientific psychological and neuroeconomic evidence on empathy, we will, however, criticize the notion of a given empathy distribution in the population by referring to recent experiments on a public goods game that suggest that, on the contrary, the degree of empathy that individuals exhibit is very much dependent on context and social interaction.
同理心是经济学中一个由来已久的问题,特别是对福利经济学而言,但近年来这一问题已逐渐淡出人们的视野。然而,随着神经经济学的兴起,人们对这个主题又重新产生了兴趣。一些经济学家甚至认为,神经科学实验揭示了个体之间同理心水平的异质性。如果情况确实如此,这将符合经济学家通常对稳定和既定偏好的假设,并极大地促进对同理心经常与之相关的亲社会行为的研究。在回顾了一些关于同理心的神经科学心理学和神经经济学证据之后,我们将通过参考最近关于公共物品博弈的实验来批评人口中既定同理心分布的概念,这些实验表明,相反,个体表现出的同理心程度在很大程度上取决于情境和社会互动。