Suppr超能文献

验证中世纪瘟疫(包括黑死病)的反季节性死亡高峰与现代鼠疫耶尔森菌变异疾病的对比。

Validation of inverse seasonal peak mortality in medieval plagues, including the Black Death, in comparison to modern Yersinia pestis-variant diseases.

机构信息

Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2009 Dec 22;4(12):e8401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008401.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have noted myriad qualitative and quantitative inconsistencies between the medieval Black Death (and subsequent "plagues") and modern empirical Y. pestis plague data, most of which is derived from the Indian and Chinese plague outbreaks of A.D. 1900+/-15 years. Previous works have noted apparent differences in seasonal mortality peaks during Black Death outbreaks versus peaks of bubonic and pneumonic plagues attributed to Y. pestis infection, but have not provided spatiotemporal statistical support. Our objective here was to validate individual observations of this seasonal discrepancy in peak mortality between historical epidemics and modern empirical data.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compiled and aggregated multiple daily, weekly and monthly datasets of both Y. pestis plague epidemics and suspected Black Death epidemics to compare seasonal differences in mortality peaks at a monthly resolution. Statistical and time series analyses of the epidemic data indicate that a seasonal inversion in peak mortality does exist between known Y. pestis plague and suspected Black Death epidemics. We provide possible explanations for this seasonal inversion.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results add further evidence of inconsistency between historical plagues, including the Black Death, and our current understanding of Y. pestis-variant disease. We expect that the line of inquiry into the disputed cause of the greatest recorded epidemic will continue to intensify. Given the rapid pace of environmental change in the modern world, it is crucial that we understand past lethal outbreaks as fully as possible in order to prepare for future deadly pandemics.

摘要

背景

最近的研究指出,中世纪黑死病(以及随后的“瘟疫”)与现代经验性鼠疫耶尔森菌鼠疫数据之间存在着无数的定性和定量不一致,其中大部分数据来源于公元 1900 年前后的印度和中国的鼠疫爆发。以前的研究已经注意到,黑死病爆发期间的季节性死亡高峰与鼠疫耶尔森菌感染引起的腺鼠疫和肺鼠疫高峰之间存在明显差异,但没有提供时空统计支持。我们的目的是验证这种季节性差异的个别观察,即历史流行病和现代经验数据之间的高峰期死亡率差异。

方法/主要发现:我们汇编和汇总了鼠疫耶尔森菌鼠疫和疑似黑死病疫情的多个每日、每周和每月数据集,以每月的分辨率比较死亡率高峰的季节性差异。对疫情数据的统计和时间序列分析表明,已知的鼠疫耶尔森菌鼠疫和疑似黑死病疫情之间确实存在死亡率高峰的季节性反转。我们为这种季节性反转提供了可能的解释。

结论/意义:这些结果进一步证明了历史瘟疫,包括黑死病,与我们目前对鼠疫耶尔森菌变体疾病的理解之间存在不一致。我们预计,对有记录以来最大的流行病争议原因的调查将继续加强。鉴于现代世界环境变化的速度如此之快,我们必须尽可能充分地了解过去的致命疫情,以便为未来的致命大流行做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717e/2791870/44213f43b347/pone.0008401.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验