• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统性红斑狼疮患者的 EQ-5D 和 SF-36 生活质量测量:与类风湿关节炎、非炎症性风湿性疾病和纤维肌痛的比较。

EQ-5D and SF-36 quality of life measures in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparisons with rheumatoid arthritis, noninflammatory rheumatic disorders, and fibromyalgia.

机构信息

National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2010 Feb;37(2):296-304. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090778. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

DOI:10.3899/jrheum.090778
PMID:20032098
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 36 (SF-36) provides numerical measurement of patient health, but does not include preferences for health states and cannot be used directly in cost-effectiveness analyses. By contrast the Euroqol EQ-5D can be used for cost-effectiveness analyses. The EQ-5D has rarely been used in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We compared SF-36 and EQ-5D values across rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We studied 1316 patients with SLE, 13,722 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 3623 with non-inflammatory rheumatic disorders (NIRD), and 2733 with fibromyalgia (FM).

RESULTS

The mean EQ-5D, physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores were 0.72, 36.3, and 44.3, respectively, in SLE. There was essentially no difference among EQ-5D and PCS scores for patients with SLE, RA, or NIRD. MCS was lower in SLE compared with RA and NIRD (44.3, 49.1, 50.8, respectively). All scores were more abnormal in FM (0.61, 31.9, 41.9). Within SF-36 domains, physical function was better, but general health, vitality, social function, role-emotional, and mental health were more impaired in SLE compared with RA and NIRD. In SLE, quality of life (QOL) was predicted by damage, comorbidity, income, education, and age. Fifteen percent of patients with SLE were very satisfied with their health, and their QOL scores (0.84, 45.4, 50.1) were similar to those found in the US population for EQ-5D and MCS, but were slightly reduced for PCS.

CONCLUSION

EQ-5D and PCS are at the same levels in SLE as in RA and NIRD, but are more abnormal in SLE in the MCS and mental health domains. EQ-5D values allow preference-based comparisons with other chronic conditions.

摘要

目的

医疗结局研究简表 36 项(SF-36)提供了患者健康的数值测量,但不包括对健康状况的偏好,因此不能直接用于成本效益分析。相比之下,EuroQol EQ-5D 可用于成本效益分析。EQ-5D 在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)中很少使用。我们比较了 SF-36 和 EQ-5D 在各种风湿性疾病中的价值。

方法

我们研究了 1316 例 SLE 患者、13722 例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者、3623 例非炎症性风湿性疾病(NIRD)患者和 2733 例纤维肌痛(FM)患者。

结果

SLE 患者的 EQ-5D、生理(PCS)和心理(MCS)综合评分均值分别为 0.72、36.3 和 44.3。SLE 患者的 EQ-5D 和 PCS 评分之间基本没有差异。与 RA 和 NIRD 相比,SLE 的 MCS 较低(分别为 44.3、49.1、50.8)。所有评分在 FM 中更异常(0.61、31.9、41.9)。在 SF-36 领域内,SLE 患者的生理功能较好,但一般健康、活力、社会功能、角色情感和心理健康较差。与 RA 和 NIRD 相比,SLE 患者的生活质量(QOL)受损害、合并症、收入、教育和年龄影响。15%的 SLE 患者对自己的健康非常满意,他们的 QOL 评分(0.84、45.4、50.1)与美国人群的 EQ-5D 和 MCS 评分相似,但 PCS 评分略低。

结论

SLE 患者的 EQ-5D 和 PCS 与 RA 和 NIRD 相同,但在 MCS 和心理健康方面更为异常。EQ-5D 可用于与其他慢性疾病进行基于偏好的比较。

相似文献

1
EQ-5D and SF-36 quality of life measures in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparisons with rheumatoid arthritis, noninflammatory rheumatic disorders, and fibromyalgia.系统性红斑狼疮患者的 EQ-5D 和 SF-36 生活质量测量:与类风湿关节炎、非炎症性风湿性疾病和纤维肌痛的比较。
J Rheumatol. 2010 Feb;37(2):296-304. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090778. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
2
Chronic conditions and health problems in rheumatic diseases: comparisons with rheumatoid arthritis, noninflammatory rheumatic disorders, systemic lupus erythematosus, and fibromyalgia.风湿性疾病中的慢性疾病和健康问题:与类风湿关节炎、非炎症性风湿性疾病、系统性红斑狼疮和纤维肌痛的比较。
J Rheumatol. 2010 Feb;37(2):305-15. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090781. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
3
Psychometric properties of the EuroQol-5D and Short Form-6D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol-5D)和简化六维健康量表(Short Form-6D)在系统性红斑狼疮患者中的心理测量特性。
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun;36(6):1209-16. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081022. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
4
Determinants of health status in fibromyalgia: a comparative study with systemic lupus erythematosus.纤维肌痛健康状况的决定因素:与系统性红斑狼疮的比较研究。
J Rheumatol. 2000 Feb;27(2):365-72.
5
How does quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus compare with that of other common chronic illnesses?系统性红斑狼疮患者的生活质量与其他常见慢性病患者的生活质量相比如何?
J Rheumatol. 2005 Sep;32(9):1706-8.
6
Predicting EuroQoL EQ-5D preference scores from the SF-12 Health Survey in a nationally representative sample.在一个具有全国代表性的样本中,根据SF-12健康调查预测欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQoL EQ-5D)偏好分数。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):160-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04264015.
7
Health-related quality of life and utility: comparison of ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus patients in Taiwan.健康相关生活质量与效用:台湾强直性脊柱炎、类风湿性关节炎和系统性红斑狼疮患者的比较。
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;36(1):133-142. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3471-y. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
8
Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol.评估类风湿关节炎中的效用值:时间权衡法与欧洲五维度健康量表的比较
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):751-6. doi: 10.1002/art.22226.
9
Health-related quality of life in Italian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. I. Relationship between physical and mental dimension and impact of age.意大利系统性红斑狼疮患者的健康相关生活质量。I. 身体和心理维度之间的关系以及年龄的影响。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Dec;43(12):1574-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh397. Epub 2004 Sep 7.
10
Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis compared with other rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study.系统性硬化症与其他风湿性疾病的健康相关生活质量比较:一项横断面研究。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Feb 15;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1842-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting EQ-5D full health state in systemic lupus erythematosus using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测系统性红斑狼疮患者的EQ-5D完全健康状态。
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2025 Apr 18;9(2):rkaf032. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaf032. eCollection 2025.
2
Positive health: An integrated quantitative approach in patients with chronic gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary disorders.积极健康:慢性胃肠胰肝胆疾病患者的综合定量方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 28;30(28):3418-3427. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i28.3418.
3
Impact of disease activity patterns on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
系统性红斑狼疮患者疾病活动模式对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Jul 29;11(2):e001202. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001202.
4
Do quality of life and work productivity change in early axial spondyloarthritis and non-axial spondyloarthritis patients after 2 years?早期中轴型脊柱关节炎和外周型脊柱关节炎患者在2年后生活质量和工作效率会发生变化吗?
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Apr 1;64(4):1826-1834. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae346.
5
Development of the American College of Rheumatology Patient-Reported Outcome Quality Measures for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.美国风湿病学会患者报告结局质量测量指标在系统性红斑狼疮中的应用进展。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Jun;76(6):777-787. doi: 10.1002/acr.25301. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
6
Discordance of global assessment between the patients and physicians predicts 9-year pain-related outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients.类风湿关节炎患者与医生之间整体评估的不一致可预测9年疼痛相关结局。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 19;10:1189748. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1189748. eCollection 2023.
7
Association between Inflammation and Thrombotic Pathway Link with Pathogenesis of Depression and Anxiety in SLE Patients.炎症与血栓形成通路的关联与 SLE 患者抑郁和焦虑的发病机制有关。
Biomolecules. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):567. doi: 10.3390/biom13030567.
8
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological interventions in fibromyalgia: Protocol for a network meta-analysis.非药物干预在纤维肌痛中的疗效和可接受性比较:网络荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 3;17(10):e0274406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274406. eCollection 2022.
9
Chronic Fatigue and Postexertional Malaise in People Living With Long COVID: An Observational Study.长新冠患者中的慢性疲劳和劳累后不适:一项观察性研究。
Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 1;102(4). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac005.
10
Quality of life of patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: The biopsychosocial path.COVID-19 大流行期间风湿性疾病患者的生活质量:心理-社会-生物途径。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 18;17(1):e0262756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262756. eCollection 2022.