Suppr超能文献

评价不同方法确定不同杏品种生长度日阈值的效果。

Evaluation of different methods for determining growing degree-day thresholds in apricot cultivars.

机构信息

Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Int J Biometeorol. 2010 Jul;54(4):411-22. doi: 10.1007/s00484-009-0292-6. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine different methods for determining growing degree-day (GDD) threshold temperatures for two phenological stages (full bloom and harvest) and select the optimal thresholds for a greater number of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars grown in the Belgrade region. A 10-year data series were used to conduct the study. Several commonly used methods to determine the threshold temperatures from field observation were evaluated: (1) the least standard deviation in GDD; (2) the least standard deviation in days; (3) the least coefficient of variation in GDD; (4) regression coefficient; (5) the least standard deviation in days with a mean temperature above the threshold; (6) the least coefficient of variation in days with a mean temperature above the threshold; and (7) the smallest root mean square error between the observed and predicted number of days. In addition, two methods for calculating daily GDD, and two methods for calculating daily mean air temperatures were tested to emphasize the differences that can arise by different interpretations of basic GDD equation. The best agreement with observations was attained by method (7). The lower threshold temperature obtained by this method differed among cultivars from -5.6 to -1.7 degrees C for full bloom, and from -0.5 to 6.6 degrees C for harvest. However, the "Null" method (lower threshold set to 0 degrees C) and "Fixed Value" method (lower threshold set to -2 degrees C for full bloom and to 3 degrees C for harvest) gave very good results. The limitations of the widely used method (1) and methods (5) and (6), which generally performed worst, are discussed in the paper.

摘要

本研究旨在检验两种物候阶段(盛花期和收获期)确定生长度日(GDD)阈值温度的不同方法,并为在贝尔格莱德地区种植的大量杏(Prunus armeniaca L.)品种选择最佳阈值。该研究使用了 10 年的数据系列。评估了几种常用的从田间观测确定阈值温度的方法:(1)GDD 的最小标准差;(2)最小标准差天数;(3)GDD 的最小变异系数;(4)回归系数;(5)平均温度高于阈值的天数的最小标准差;(6)平均温度高于阈值的天数的最小变异系数;(7)观察到的和预测的天数之间的最小均方根误差。此外,还测试了两种计算日 GDD 的方法和两种计算日平均空气温度的方法,以强调基本 GDD 方程不同解释可能产生的差异。方法(7)与观测结果的吻合度最佳。该方法得出的较低阈值温度在不同品种之间存在差异,盛花期为-5.6 至-1.7 摄氏度,收获期为-0.5 至 6.6 摄氏度。然而,“Null”方法(将较低阈值设置为 0 摄氏度)和“Fixed Value”方法(将较低阈值设置为盛花期-2 摄氏度,收获期 3 摄氏度)的效果非常好。文中讨论了广泛使用的方法(1)和方法(5)和(6)的局限性,这些方法的表现通常最差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验