• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从患者和医生的角度出发,制定用于结直肠癌的共享决策框架。

Using patient and physician perspectives to develop a shared decision-making framework for colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2009 Dec 24;4:81. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-81.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-4-81
PMID:20034402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2804716/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of death from cancer worldwide with over 900,000 diagnoses and 639,000 deaths each year. Although shared decision making is broadly advocated as a mechanism by which to achieve patient-centred care, there has been little investigation of patient and physician shared decision-making preferences and practices or the outcomes associated with shared decision making in the context of colorectal cancer.

AIM

The aim of this study is to determine patient and physician attitudes towards the use of shared decision making in the setting of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Standard principles of qualitative research will be used to sample and interview 20 colorectal cancer patients in each of three tertiary care hospitals (n = 60) and 15 surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists (n = 45) affiliated with cancer centres. The interview questions will be guided by a conceptual framework defining patient and physician factors that influence the shared decision-making process and associated outcomes in the setting of colorectal cancer. An inductive, grounded approach will be used by two investigators to independently analyze the interview transcripts. These investigators will meet to compare and achieve consensus on themes that will be tabulated to compare barriers, enablers, and outcomes of shared decision making by patient, physician, and contextual factors.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to examine both patient and physician perspectives on the use of shared decision making for colorectal cancer in North America or elsewhere. It will provide a framework that can be used to describe the shared decision-making process and its outcomes, and evaluate strategies to facilitate this process for patients with colorectal cancer.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌是全球癌症死亡的第三大主要原因,每年有超过 90 万人被诊断出患有结直肠癌,63.9 万人死于结直肠癌。尽管广泛倡导共享决策作为实现以患者为中心的护理的机制,但对于患者和医生在结直肠癌背景下的共享决策偏好和实践,以及与共享决策相关的结果,研究甚少。

目的

本研究旨在确定患者和医生对在结直肠癌环境中使用共享决策的态度。

方法

将使用定性研究的标准原则,在三家三级保健医院(n=60)中各抽样并访谈 20 名结直肠癌患者,在与癌症中心相关的 15 名外科医生、放射肿瘤学家和肿瘤内科医生(n=45)中各抽样并访谈 20 名。访谈问题将由一个概念框架指导,该框架定义了影响结直肠癌环境中共享决策过程和相关结果的患者和医生因素。两位研究人员将采用归纳、扎根的方法独立分析访谈记录。这两位研究人员将开会比较并就主题达成共识,这些主题将被制表,以比较患者、医生和背景因素对共享决策的障碍、促进因素和结果。

讨论

这项研究首次在北美或其他地方检查了患者和医生对结直肠癌使用共享决策的观点。它将提供一个框架,可用于描述共享决策过程及其结果,并评估为结直肠癌患者促进这一过程的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1004/2804716/9bc71e8d8d21/1748-5908-4-81-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1004/2804716/9bc71e8d8d21/1748-5908-4-81-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1004/2804716/9bc71e8d8d21/1748-5908-4-81-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Using patient and physician perspectives to develop a shared decision-making framework for colorectal cancer.从患者和医生的角度出发,制定用于结直肠癌的共享决策框架。
Implement Sci. 2009 Dec 24;4:81. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-81.
2
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
3
What Is Important When Making Treatment Decisions in Metastatic Breast Cancer? A Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making in Patients and Oncologists.在转移性乳腺癌的治疗决策中什么是重要的?对患者和肿瘤医生决策的定性分析。
Oncologist. 2019 Oct;24(10):1313-1321. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0711. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
5
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.患者和医生对癌症共同决策的看法。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1248-1253. doi: 10.1111/hex.12564. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.结直肠癌筛查的共同决策:指导研究的概念框架。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
7
How do surgeons decide to refer patients for adjuvant cancer treatment? Protocol for a qualitative study.外科医生如何决定为患者转介辅助癌症治疗?一项定性研究的方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Oct 25;7:102. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-102.
8
How are decisions made in cancer care? A qualitative study using participant observation of current practice.癌症护理中的决策是如何做出的?一项通过对当前实践进行参与观察的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e016360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016360.
9
Trust but Verify: Exploring the Role of Treatment-Related Information and Patient-Physician Trust in Shared Decision Making Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.信任但需验证:探索转移性乳腺癌患者在共享决策中的治疗相关信息和医患信任的作用。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Oct;35(5):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01538-x.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental Educational Intervention to Facilitate Informed Consent for Pediatric Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.家长教育干预措施以促进急诊科小儿程序性镇静的知情同意:一项平行组随机对照试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;10(12):2353. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122353.
2
Use of unstructured intervention in a community-based mental health setting for the recovery of people with depression in Hong Kong: A qualitative assessment.在社区心理健康环境中使用非结构化干预措施促进香港抑郁症患者康复:定性评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5693-e5702. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13999. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Physicians' awareness and attitudes toward decision aids for patients with cancer.医生对癌症患者决策辅助工具的认知和态度。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1;28(13):2286-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2874. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
2
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.提高对邮寄问卷和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4.
3
Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation: an exploratory study.患者参与卫生服务规划与评估的障碍:一项探索性研究。
Iranian Cancer Patients Perceptions of Barriers to Participation in Decision-Making: Potential Impact on Patient-Centered Care.
伊朗癌症患者对参与决策障碍的看法:对以患者为中心的护理的潜在影响。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Oct-Dec;6(4):372-380. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_11_19.
4
Educational video-assisted versus conventional informed consent for trauma-related debridement surgery: a parallel group randomized controlled trial.教育视频辅助与传统方式进行创伤相关清创手术知情同意的比较:一项平行组随机对照试验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 9;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0264-7.
5
Does geography influence the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer? A population-based analysis.地理位置是否影响结直肠癌的治疗和结局?一项基于人群的分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun 17;11:140. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-140.
6
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for dyspepsia: exploratory study of factors influencing patient compliance in Greece.上消化道内镜检查用于消化不良:希腊影响患者依从性因素的探索性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 14;11:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-11.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Feb;70(2):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
4
Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis.患者决策辅助工具是否符合国际患者决策辅助工具标准协作组织的有效性标准?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):554-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07307319. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
The context influences doctors' support of shared decision-making in cancer care.这种背景情况会影响医生对癌症护理中共同决策的支持度。
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jul 2;97(1):6-13. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603841. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
6
Consumer impact of an interactive decision aid for rectal cancer patients offered adjuvant therapy.为直肠癌患者提供辅助治疗的交互式决策辅助工具对患者的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2006 Oct;8(8):676-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00975.x.
7
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.临床实践中实施共同决策的障碍与促进因素:对卫生专业人员认知的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2006 Aug 9;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-16.
8
Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.患者对信息、决策和人际行为的偏好的最佳匹配:证据、模型与干预措施
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):319-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
9
Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients--a Dutch colorectal cancer group study.短程术前放疗联合全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的晚期副作用:放疗患者肠道功能障碍增加——一项荷兰结直肠癌研究组的研究
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):6199-206. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.779.
10
Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer.直肠癌手术后男性和女性性功能障碍的发生率很高。
Ann Surg. 2005 Aug;242(2):212-23. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000171299.43954.ce.