Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Mar;87(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
To compare the predictive power of anthropometric indices (BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHpR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR)) for diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia in Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (TSI) adults.
Cross-sectional study of 2862 Indigenous Australians aged over 15 living in rural communities in Far North Queensland during 1999-2001. The predictive values of anthropometric indices for cardio-metabolic disorders were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
BMI was the poorest predictor while WHpR was the best among the four measures. The optimal WHtR and WHpR cut-off points for the cardio-metabolic risks in both women and men in the two Indigenous populations were 0.5-0.6 and 0.9 respectively. Optimal BMI cut-offs for diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were much lower in Aborigines than the recommended WHO BMI cut-offs, while those in TSIs were around WHO BMI criteria. The optimal WC cut-points varied by gender and ethnicity.
BMI was not a good discriminator of cardio-metabolic risk factors in Australian Indigenous populations compared with other anthropometric indices. WHpR is more closely associated with the risk of cardio-metabolic in these high-risk populations.
比较人体测量指数(BMI、腰围(WC)、腰臀比(WHpR)和腰高比(WHtR))在预测澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民(TSI)成年人糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常方面的预测能力。
对 1999-2001 年间生活在昆士兰州北部农村社区的 2862 名 15 岁以上的土著澳大利亚人进行横断面研究。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析比较人体测量指数对心血管代谢紊乱的预测价值。
BMI 是最差的预测指标,而 WHpR 是这四个指标中最好的。在这两个土著人群中,女性和男性的最佳 WHtR 和 WHpR 切点值分别为 0.5-0.6 和 0.9。在原住民中,最佳 BMI 切点值与 WHO 推荐的 BMI 切点值相比,用于糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常的切点值要低得多,而 TSI 的切点值则接近 WHO BMI 标准。最佳 WC 切点值因性别和种族而异。
与其他人体测量指数相比,BMI 不是澳大利亚土著人群心血管代谢危险因素的良好判别指标。WHpR 与这些高危人群心血管代谢风险的相关性更密切。