Dinc Umut Ali, Oncel Banu, Gorgun Ebru, Yalvac Ilgaz S
Yeditepe University Eye Hospital, Ophthalmology Department, Istanbul - Turkey.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010 May-Jun;20(3):531-7. doi: 10.1177/112067211002000327.
To assess and compare the anterior chamber angle (ACA) by different anterior segment imaging techniques.
Forty healthy eyes of 40 normal subjects were recruited and 3 consecutive measurements of ACA were determined prospectively utilizing Visante optical coherence tomography (OCT), slit-lamp OCT (SL-OCT), and Pentacam. Statistical significance of interdevice differences between measurements was evaluated by Wilcoxon signed rank test and Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of 3 consecutive measurements was analyzed by repeated measured analysis of variance.
Mean nasal and temporal ACA were detected as 31.2+/-8.7 and 32.1+/-8.5 degrees by Visante OCT; 41.6+/-5.9 and 41.8+/-5.2 degrees by Pentacam; and 42.9+/-10.0 and 43.3+/-10.1 degrees by SL-OCT. All devices displayed a high intrasession repeatability (Scheffe multiple comparison, p>0.05). ACA detected by Visante OCT were found significantly different from ACA calculated by Pentacam and SL-OCT (p<0.05). On the other hand, ACA data obtained by Pentacam and SL-OCT were found to be statistically similar (p>0.05).
Although noncontact ACA measurements using all modalities were easy to handle and demonstrated good repeatability in healthy participants, the tested devices were not regarded as comparable. Hence, the clinician should take the different modalities into consideration during ACA assessment using various devices.
通过不同的眼前节成像技术评估和比较前房角(ACA)。
招募40名正常受试者的40只健康眼睛,使用Visante光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、裂隙灯OCT(SL - OCT)和Pentacam前瞻性地连续3次测量ACA。通过Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Bland - Altman分析评估测量设备间差异的统计学显著性。通过重复测量方差分析分析连续3次测量的重复性。
Visante OCT检测到的鼻侧和颞侧平均ACA分别为31.2±8.7度和32.1±8.5度;Pentacam检测到的分别为41.6±5.9度和41.8±5.2度;SL - OCT检测到的分别为42.9±10.0度和43.3±10.1度。所有设备均显示出较高的测量期间重复性(Scheffe多重比较,p>0.05)。发现Visante OCT检测到的ACA与Pentacam和SL - OCT计算出的ACA有显著差异(p<0.05)。另一方面,发现Pentacam和SL - OCT获得的ACA数据在统计学上相似(p>0.05)。
尽管使用所有模式进行的非接触式ACA测量易于操作,且在健康受试者中显示出良好的重复性,但所测试的设备不被认为具有可比性。因此,临床医生在使用各种设备进行ACA评估时应考虑不同的模式。