• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用超声生物显微镜和Artemis-2甚高频超声扫描仪进行眼前节生物测量。

Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner.

作者信息

Al-Farhan Haya M, Almutairi Reem N

机构信息

King Saud University, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:141-7. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S39463. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S39463
PMID:23345968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3551458/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the precision of anterior chamber angle (ACA) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements taken with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and the Artemis-2 Very High Frequency Ultrasound Scanner (VHFUS) in normal subjects.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

METHODS

We randomly selected one eye from each of 59 normal subjects in this study. Two subjects dropped out of the study; the associated data were excluded from analysis. ACA and ACD measurements were obtained using the VHFUS and the UBM. The results were compared statistically using repeated-measures analysis of variance for the intraobserver repeatability, unpaired t-test, and limits of agreement.

RESULTS

The average ACA values for the UBM and the VHFUS (±standard deviation) were 41.83° ± 5.03° and 33.36° ± 6.03°, respectively. The average ACD values were 2.96 ± 0.34 mm and 2.87 ± 0.31 mm. The intraobserver repeatability analysis of variance P-values for ACA and ACD measurements using UBM were 0.10 and 0.68, respectively; for the Artemis-2 VHFUS, the respective values were 0.68 and 0.09. The difference in ACA measurements was statistically significant (t = 8.41; P < 0.0001), while the difference in ACD values was not (t = 1.51; P < 0.13). The mean ACA difference was 8.50° ± 2.50°, and the limits of agreement were +13.30° to -3.60°. The mean ACD difference was 0.09 ± 0.27 mm, and the limits of agreement ranged from 0.61 mm to -0.43 mm. The mean difference percentage of ACD was 3.1% for both instruments.

CONCLUSION

In case of the ACD, both instruments can be used interchangeably; however, with the ACA instruments, they cannot be used interchangeably.

摘要

目的

比较超声生物显微镜(UBM)和Artemis - 2甚高频超声扫描仪(VHFUS)在正常受试者中测量前房角(ACA)和前房深度(ACD)的精度。

设计

前瞻性研究。

方法

本研究中我们从59名正常受试者中随机选取一只眼睛。两名受试者退出研究;相关数据被排除在分析之外。使用VHFUS和UBM获得ACA和ACD测量值。使用重复测量方差分析进行观察者内重复性、非配对t检验和一致性界限分析,对结果进行统计学比较。

结果

UBM和VHFUS的平均ACA值(±标准差)分别为41.83°±5.03°和33.36°±6.03°。平均ACD值分别为2.96±0.34mm和2.87±0.31mm。使用UBM测量ACA和ACD的观察者内重复性方差分析P值分别为0.10和0.68;对于Artemis - 2 VHFUS,相应的值分别为0.68和0.09。ACA测量值的差异具有统计学意义(t = 8.41;P < 0.0001),而ACD值的差异无统计学意义(t = 1.51;P < 0.13)。平均ACA差异为8.50°±2.50°,一致性界限为+13.30°至 - 3.60°。平均ACD差异为0.09±0.27mm,一致性界限范围为0.61mm至 - 0.43mm。两种仪器的ACD平均差异百分比均为3.1%。

结论

对于ACD,两种仪器可互换使用;然而,对于ACA测量仪器,它们不能互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/7861f4add619/opth-7-141f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/7ac2ad565b58/opth-7-141f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/e56aa9e58e08/opth-7-141f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/3c6ff46c5673/opth-7-141f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/7861f4add619/opth-7-141f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/7ac2ad565b58/opth-7-141f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/e56aa9e58e08/opth-7-141f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/3c6ff46c5673/opth-7-141f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0232/3551458/7861f4add619/opth-7-141f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Anterior segment biometry using ultrasound biomicroscopy and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner.使用超声生物显微镜和Artemis-2甚高频超声扫描仪进行眼前节生物测量。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:141-7. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S39463. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
Agreement between Orbscan II, VuMAX UBM and Artemis-2 very-high frequency ultrasound scanner for measurement of anterior chamber depth.Orbscan II、VuMAX UBM 和 Artemis-2 甚高频超声扫描仪测量前房深度的一致性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb 25;14:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-20.
3
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis-2 VHF scanner in normal eyes.在正常眼睛中使用超声角膜测厚法、超声生物显微镜和Artemis-2甚高频扫描仪测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1037-43. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S32955. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
4
Comparison of anterior section parameters using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in myopic patients after ICL implantation.在植入有晶体眼人工晶状体(ICL)的近视患者中,使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描和超声生物显微镜对眼前节参数进行比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan 18;9(1):58-62. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.01.10. eCollection 2016.
5
[Comparison of swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in measurement of anterior chamber depth and anterior chamber angle data in age-related cataract patients].扫频源眼前节光学相干断层扫描与超声生物显微镜测量年龄相关性白内障患者前房深度和前房角数据的比较
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 11;54(9):678-682. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2018.09.008.
6
Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius(®) Scheimpflug tomography and ultrasound.使用Sirius(®)Scheimpflug断层扫描和超声测量中央角膜厚度和前房深度
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:417-22. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S35121. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
7
Measurements of central corneal thickness using two immersion ultrasound techniques and optical technique.使用两种浸入式超声技术和光学技术测量中央角膜厚度。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Mar;64(3):266-70.
8
The effect of pharmacologic pupillary dilatation on anterior segment parameters in patients with exfoliation syndrome.药物性瞳孔散大对剥脱综合征患者眼前节参数的影响。
J Optom. 2014 Jan-Mar;7(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
9
Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy.超声生物显微镜与光学相干断层扫描测量人工晶状体眼和无晶状体眼前房中央深度的重复性、可再现性和一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.038.
10
Anterior segment biometry with 2 imaging technologies: very-high-frequency ultrasound scanning versus optical coherence tomography.两种成像技术用于眼前节生物测量:甚高频超声扫描与光学相干断层扫描的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.08.033.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Golay-coded excitation in real-time imaging of high frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy.基于戈莱码激励的高频超声生物显微镜实时成象技术研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):1848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80406-x.
2
Clinical efficacy of modified partial pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification for malignant glaucoma.改良式扁平部玻璃体切除术联合超声乳化术治疗恶性青光眼的临床疗效
Eye (Lond). 2016 Aug;30(8):1094-100. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.106. Epub 2016 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with anterior chamber narrowing with age: an optical coherence tomography study.与年龄相关的前房变窄因素:一项光学相干断层扫描研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 9;53(6):2607-10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9359.
2
[Quantitative observation on changes of anterior segment by ultrasound biomicroscopy after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation].[后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术后眼前节变化的超声生物显微镜定量观察]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;47(9):815-9.
3
Value of optical coherence tomography for anterior segment surgery.
光学相干断层扫描在前节手术中的价值。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jul;36(7):1213-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.002.
4
Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy.超声生物显微镜与光学相干断层扫描测量人工晶状体眼和无晶状体眼前房中央深度的重复性、可再现性和一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.038.
5
Assessment of anterior chamber depth using Visante optical coherence tomography, slitlamp optical coherence tomography, IOL Master, Pentacam and Orbscan IIz.使用 Visante 光学相干断层扫描仪、裂隙灯光学相干断层扫描仪、IOL Master、Pentacam 和 Orbscan IIz 评估前房深度。
Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(6):341-6. doi: 10.1159/000313815. Epub 2010 May 4.
6
Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam.使用 Visante OCT、Orbscan 和 Pentacam 测量中央角膜厚度、前房深度和瞳孔直径。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):127-33. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-08. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
7
Assessment of anterior chamber angle using Visante OCT, slit-lamp OCT, and Pentacam.使用Visante光学相干断层扫描、裂隙灯光学相干断层扫描和Pentacam评估前房角。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010 May-Jun;20(3):531-7. doi: 10.1177/112067211002000327.
8
Comparison of different modes in optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in anterior chamber angle assessment.光学相干断层扫描和超声生物显微镜在前房角评估中不同模式的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2009 Aug;18(6):472-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31818fb41d.
9
Accuracy and repeatability of direct ciliary sulcus diameter measurements by full-scale 50-megahertz ultrasound biomicroscopy.通过全尺寸50兆赫兹超声生物显微镜直接测量睫状沟直径的准确性和可重复性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Apr 20;122(8):955-9.
10
Anterior chamber angle measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography: a comparison between slit lamp OCT and Visante OCT.眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量前房角:裂隙灯OCT与Visante OCT的比较
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Aug;49(8):3469-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1477. Epub 2008 Apr 11.