Suppr超能文献

共享药物治疗对老年患者的成本效益:RESPECT 试验结果。

Cost-effectiveness of shared pharmaceutical care for older patients: RESPECT trial findings.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jan;60(570):e20-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X482312.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmaceutical care serves as a collaborative model for medication review. Its use is advocated for older patients, although its cost-effectiveness is unknown. Although the accompanying article on clinical effectiveness from the RESPECT (Randomised Evaluation of Shared Prescribing for Elderly people in the Community over Time) trial finds no statistically significant impact on prescribing for older patients undergoing pharmaceutical care, economic evaluations are based on an estimation, rather than hypothesis testing.

AIM

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical care for older people compared with usual care, according to National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) reference case standards.

METHODS

An economic evaluation was undertaken in which NICE reference case standards were applied to data collected in the RESPECT trial.

RESULTS

On average, pharmaceutical care is estimated to cost an incremental 10 000 UK pounds per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY). If the NHS's cost-effectiveness threshold is between 20 000 and 30 000 UK pounds per extra QALY, then the results indicate that pharmaceutical care is cost-effective despite a lack of statistical significance to this effect. However, the statistical uncertainty surrounding the estimates implies that the probability that pharmaceutical care is not cost-effective lies between 0.22 and 0.19. Although results are not sensitive to assumptions about costs, they differ between subgroups: in patients aged >75 years pharmaceutical care appears more cost-effective for those who are younger or on fewer repeat medications.

CONCLUSION

Although pharmaceutical care is estimated to be cost-effective in the UK, the results are uncertain and further research into its long-term benefits may be worthwhile.

摘要

背景

药物治疗服务是一种协作模式,用于药物审查。尽管它的成本效益未知,但提倡为老年患者使用。尽管 RESPECT(随着时间的推移对社区中的老年人进行共享处方的随机评估)试验关于临床效果的相关文章发现,对接受药物治疗服务的老年患者的处方没有统计学上的显著影响,但经济评估是基于估计而不是假设检验。

目的

根据英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的参考病例标准,评估老年人药物治疗服务与常规护理相比的成本效益。

方法

进行了一项经济评估,其中应用了 NICE 参考病例标准来评估 RESPECT 试验中收集的数据。

结果

平均而言,药物治疗服务估计每增加一个质量调整生命年(QALY)额外增加 10000 英镑。如果 NHS 的成本效益阈值在每额外增加一个 QALY 20000 到 30000 英镑之间,那么结果表明,尽管没有统计学意义表明这种效果,但药物治疗服务具有成本效益。然而,估计的统计不确定性意味着药物治疗服务无效益的概率在 0.22 到 0.19 之间。尽管结果对成本假设不敏感,但它们在亚组之间存在差异:对于年龄>75 岁的患者,药物治疗服务对于年龄较小或服用较少重复药物的患者来说似乎更具成本效益。

结论

尽管药物治疗服务在英国被估计为具有成本效益,但结果不确定,进一步研究其长期效益可能是值得的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Pharmaceutical care programmes for the elderly: economic issues.老年人的药学服务项目:经济问题
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(7):455-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321070-00001.
10
Critical analysis of the pharmaceutical care research literature.
Ann Pharmacother. 1998 Jan;32(1):17-26. doi: 10.1177/106002809803200101.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验