Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Implement Sci. 2009 Dec 31;4:84. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-84.
Evidence-based quality improvement models for depression have not been fully implemented in routine primary care settings. To date, few studies have examined the organizational factors associated with depression management in real-world primary care practice. To successfully implement quality improvement models for depression, there must be a better understanding of the relevant organizational structure and processes of the primary care setting. The objective of this study is to describe these organizational features of routine primary care practice, and the organization of depression care, using survey questions derived from an evidence-based framework.
We used this framework to implement a survey of 27 practices comprised of 49 unique offices within a large primary care practice network in western Pennsylvania. Survey questions addressed practice structure (e.g., human resources, leadership, information technology (IT) infrastructure, and external incentives) and process features (e.g., staff performance, degree of integrated depression care, and IT performance).
The results of our survey demonstrated substantial variation across the practice network of organizational factors pertinent to implementation of evidence-based depression management. Notably, quality improvement capability and IT infrastructure were widespread, but specific application to depression care differed between practices, as did coordination and communication tasks surrounding depression treatment.
The primary care practices in the network that we surveyed are at differing stages in their organization and implementation of evidence-based depression management. Practical surveys such as this may serve to better direct implementation of these quality improvement strategies for depression by improving understanding of the organizational barriers and facilitators that exist within both practices and practice networks. In addition, survey information can inform efforts of individual primary care practices in customizing intervention strategies to improve depression management.
基于证据的抑郁症质量改进模式尚未在常规初级保健环境中得到充分实施。迄今为止,很少有研究探讨与真实世界初级保健实践中抑郁症管理相关的组织因素。要成功实施抑郁症质量改进模式,必须更好地了解初级保健环境的相关组织结构和流程。本研究的目的是使用源自循证框架的调查问题描述常规初级保健实践的这些组织特征和抑郁症护理的组织。
我们使用该框架对宾夕法尼亚州西部一个大型初级保健实践网络中的 27 个实践(由 49 个独特的办公室组成)进行了调查。调查问题涉及实践结构(例如人力资源、领导力、信息技术 (IT) 基础设施和外部激励措施)和流程特征(例如员工绩效、综合抑郁症护理程度和 IT 绩效)。
我们调查的实践网络中与实施基于证据的抑郁症管理相关的组织因素存在很大差异。值得注意的是,质量改进能力和 IT 基础设施很普遍,但具体应用于抑郁症护理在实践之间存在差异,围绕抑郁症治疗的协调和沟通任务也是如此。
我们调查的网络中的初级保健实践在其组织和实施基于证据的抑郁症管理方面处于不同阶段。这样的实用调查可以通过更好地了解实践和实践网络中存在的组织障碍和促进因素,更好地指导这些抑郁症质量改进策略的实施。此外,调查信息可以为单个初级保健实践提供信息,以定制干预策略来改善抑郁症管理。