Galen Research Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Respir Med. 2010 May;104(5):633-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.11.023. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
Current asthma patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures focus on symptoms and functioning and may not capture the holistic impact of asthma on the quality of life of the patient.
To develop a PRO measure capturing the overall impact of asthma on patient's quality of life.
Items for the Asthma Life Impact Scale (ALIS) were generated from patients with asthma during interviews in the UK and focus groups in the US. The ALIS was tested with UK and US asthma patients during cognitive debriefing interviews and included in large, two-administration, validation studies in the UK and US.
Issues raised by asthma patients during interviews (n = 39 patients) and focus groups (n = 16 patients) were included in the draft ALIS. Cognitive debriefing interviews with 29 UK and US asthma patients showed that the scale was relevant and comprehensive. 140 UK and 185 US asthma patients participated in the validation study. The analysis showed that the ALIS measures a single construct, namely the overall impact of asthma on patients' quality of life. Internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha) was high (UK = 0.94; US = 0.92) as was test-retest reliability (UK = 0.93; US = 0.83). Patients reporting worse general health or more severe asthma had significantly higher ALIS scores (p < 0.001) (indicating greater negative impact of asthma). Correlations with the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire were moderate to high.
The final 22-item ALIS is unidimensional, reliable and valid, and a valuable tool for comprehensively assessing the holistic impact of asthma from the patient's perspective.
目前的哮喘患者报告结局(PRO)测量方法侧重于症状和功能,可能无法全面反映哮喘对患者生活质量的影响。
开发一种 PRO 测量方法,全面评估哮喘对患者生活质量的影响。
从英国的哮喘患者访谈和美国的焦点小组中获取哮喘生命影响量表(ALIS)的项目。在英国和美国的认知访谈中对 ALIS 进行了测试,并在英国和美国进行了两项大型、两次给药的验证研究。
在访谈(n = 39 例患者)和焦点小组(n = 16 例患者)中,哮喘患者提出的问题被纳入了 ALIS 的草案。对 29 名英国和美国哮喘患者进行的认知访谈表明,该量表具有相关性和全面性。140 名英国和 185 名美国哮喘患者参加了验证研究。分析表明,ALIS 测量了一个单一的构念,即哮喘对患者生活质量的总体影响。内部一致性(Cronbach's Alpha)较高(英国=0.94;美国=0.92),重测信度也较高(英国=0.93;美国=0.83)。报告一般健康状况较差或哮喘较严重的患者的 ALIS 评分显著更高(p < 0.001)(表明哮喘的负面影响更大)。与哮喘生活质量问卷的相关性为中度至高度。
最终的 22 项 ALIS 具有单一维度、可靠性和有效性,是从患者角度全面评估哮喘整体影响的有价值工具。