Suppr超能文献

当生物标志物与标准筛查试验联合使用时评估特异性改善的方法。

Methods for Assessing Improvement in Specificity when a Biomarker is Combined with a Standard Screening Test.

作者信息

Shaw Pamela A, Pepe Margaret S, Alonzo Todd A, Etzioni Ruth

机构信息

Biostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892.

出版信息

Stat Biopharm Res. 2009 Feb 1;1(1):18-25. doi: 10.1198/sbr.2009.0002.

Abstract

Biomarkers that can be used in combination with established screening tests to reduce false positive rates are in considerable demand. In this article, we present methods for evaluating the diagnostic performance of combination tests that require positivity on a biomarker test in addition to a standard screening test. These methods rely on relative true and false positive rates to measure the loss in sensitivity and gain in specificity associated with the combination relative to the standard test. Inference about the relative rates follows from noting their interpretation as conditional probabilities. These methods are extended to evaluate combinations with continuous biomarker tests by introducing a new statistical entity, the relative receiver operating characteristic (rROC) curve. The rROC curve plots the relative true positive rate versus the relative false positive rate as the biomarker threshold for positivity varies. Inference can be made by applying existing ROC methodology. We illustrate the methods with two examples: a breast cancer biomarker study proposed by the Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) and a prostate cancer case-control study examining the ability of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to improve the specificity of the standard PSA test.

摘要

人们迫切需要能够与现有筛查测试相结合以降低假阳性率的生物标志物。在本文中,我们提出了评估联合测试诊断性能的方法,这些联合测试除了标准筛查测试外,还需要生物标志物测试呈阳性。这些方法依靠相对真阳性率和假阳性率来衡量与标准测试相比,联合测试在敏感性方面的损失和特异性方面的提高。关于相对率的推断源于将它们解释为条件概率。通过引入一个新的统计实体——相对接受者操作特征(rROC)曲线,这些方法被扩展到评估连续生物标志物测试的联合情况。rROC曲线绘制了随着生物标志物阳性阈值的变化,相对真阳性率与相对假阳性率的关系。可以通过应用现有的ROC方法进行推断。我们用两个例子来说明这些方法:早期检测研究网络(EDRN)提出的一项乳腺癌生物标志物研究,以及一项前列腺癌病例对照研究,该研究考察游离前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)提高标准PSA测试特异性的能力。

相似文献

3
Doppler trans-thoracic echocardiography for detection of pulmonary hypertension in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 9;5(5):CD012809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012809.pub2.
4
Combining biomarkers to detect disease with application to prostate cancer.
Biostatistics. 2003 Oct;4(4):523-38. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.4.523.
6
First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 15;3(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600.
9
New Screening Test Improves Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Circulating Tumor Cells and Prostate-Specific Markers.
Front Oncol. 2020 Apr 23;10:582. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00582. eCollection 2020.
10
Zinc α2-glycoprotein as a potential novel urine biomarker for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11501.x. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of methods for the analysis of diagnostic tests performed in sequence.
Diagn Progn Res. 2024 Sep 3;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00175-3.
3
Characteristics of Donors and Modelling of the Characteristics to Possible Forecast the Repeat Donors Profile at Thammasat University Hospital.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2023 Jan;39(1):146-150. doi: 10.1007/s12288-022-01552-y. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
4
Development of a Risk Score to Predict Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 18;19(16):10270. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610270.
5
Plasma miR-1247-5p, miR-301b-3p and miR-105-5p as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer.
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Feb;12(4):539-548. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13800. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Serum microRNA-135a as a diagnostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(50):e17814. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017814.
7
More Accurate Oral Cancer Screening with Fewer Salivary Biomarkers.
Biomark Cancer. 2017 Oct 17;9:1179299X17732007. doi: 10.1177/1179299X17732007. eCollection 2017.
8
Using Relative Statistics and Approximate Disease Prevalence to Compare Screening Tests.
Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2). doi: 10.1515/ijb-2016-0017.
9
Analysis of Viral Diversity in Relation to the Recency of HIV-1C Infection in Botswana.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 23;11(8):e0160649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160649. eCollection 2016.
10
Pseudomonas aeruginosa serology and risk for re-isolation in the EPIC trial.
J Cyst Fibros. 2013 Mar;12(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The economic impact of false-positive cancer screens.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Dec;13(12):2126-32.
3
Comparing disease screening tests when true disease status is ascertained only for screen positives.
Biostatistics. 2001 Sep;2(3):249-60. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.3.249.
5
Prostate-specific antigen: current status.
CA Cancer J Clin. 1999 Sep-Oct;49(5):264-81. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.49.5.264.
6
Early detection cancer research network.
Lab Invest. 2000 Aug;80(8):1147-8. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780122.
7
Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.
Stat Med. 1998 May 15;17(9):1033-53. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980515)17:9<1033::aid-sim784>3.0.co;2-z.
9
Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1089-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601.
10
Comparison of the accuracy of two tests with a confirmatory procedure limited to positive results.
Epidemiology. 1997 Jan;8(1):104-6. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199701000-00017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验