Suppr超能文献

单次内镜超声检查和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术用于评估胰胆系统疾病。

Single-session endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disorders.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, PO Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1447-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0798-3. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) often are required in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pancreaticobiliary disorders. Few reports of single-session EUS-ERCP have raised questions regarding its safety and accuracy or about which procedure should be performed first.

METHODS

Data from 2005 to 2009 were reviewed from a prospectively maintained EUS-ERCP database at a single tertiary care cancer center. Sensitivity and specificity of EUS and fine-needle aspiration (FNA), bile duct cannulation rate, duration of procedure, and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients (15 men and 20 women) studied, 28 had a final diagnosis of malignancy, and 7 had benign disorders. All the patients underwent ERCP and EUS, with FNA performed for 28 patients (80%). For 22 of the 35 patients (62.8%), EUS was the first procedure performed. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA for malignancy was 96.4%. The bile duct cannulation rate during ERCP was 97.1%. Five patients required a precut sphincterotomy for bile duct access, and one patient with chronic pancreatitis had a failed cannulation despite a EUS-guided rendezvous. A stent was successfully placed in 29 patients (96%). No major complications occurred, and no contrast leak was seen when FNA was performed before the cholangiogram. One patient had periduodenal bleeding after FNA, which was managed conservatively. The mean duration of the procedure was 83.7 min.

CONCLUSION

Single-session EUS-ERCP can be performed safely and with efficacy similar to that of the procedures performed separately.

摘要

背景

内镜超声检查(EUS)和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)常用于评估和治疗胰胆疾病患者。少数关于单次 EUS-ERCP 的报道引起了人们对其安全性和准确性的质疑,或者对应该首先进行哪种检查的疑问。

方法

从一家三级癌症治疗中心前瞻性维护的 EUS-ERCP 数据库中回顾了 2005 年至 2009 年的数据。评估了 EUS 和细针抽吸(FNA)的敏感性和特异性、胆管插管率、手术持续时间和并发症。

结果

在 35 名患者(15 名男性和 20 名女性)中,28 名患者的最终诊断为恶性肿瘤,7 名患者为良性疾病。所有患者均接受了 ERCP 和 EUS 检查,对 28 名患者(80%)进行了 FNA。在 35 名患者中,有 22 名(62.8%)患者首先进行了 EUS 检查。EUS-FNA 对恶性肿瘤的敏感性为 96.4%。ERCP 时胆管插管率为 97.1%。5 名患者需要进行预切开括约肌切开术以获取胆管通路,1 名患有慢性胰腺炎的患者尽管进行了 EUS 引导的会师术,但仍无法插管。29 名患者(96%)成功放置了支架。无主要并发症发生,在胆管造影前进行 FNA 时未见造影剂漏出。1 名患者在 FNA 后出现十二指肠周围出血,经保守治疗后得到控制。该手术的平均持续时间为 83.7 分钟。

结论

单次 EUS-ERCP 可安全有效地进行,其效果与分别进行的检查相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验