Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, MG, Brazil.
Embrapa Trigo, Passo Fundo, 70770-901 RS, Brazil.
Plant Dis. 2017 Sep;101(9):1633-1641. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-17-0340-RE. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
Triazole and benzimidazole fungicides have been used for controlling Fusarium head blight (FHB) in wheat for over two decades. In Brazil, it was only during the last five years that uniform fungicide trials for FHB control have been established yearly, thus contributing to a new large body of fungicide efficacy data for this country. A systematic review of both peer- and non-peer-reviewed studies on chemical control conducted since 2000 in Brazil was performed. Fungicides of interest were the triazoles tebuconazole (TEBU and TEBU) and propiconazole (PROP), and the benzimidazole carbendazim (CARB). Most fungicides were applied twice, the first at early to mid-flowering and the second 7 to 10 days later. Only TEBU was tested as one or two applications, and thus four treatments were evaluated. For these fungicides, there were 35 trials reporting FHB index and 48 reporting mean yield. Network meta-analytic models were fitted to the data of the log of the means of FHB index for each fungicide and for the nontreated check. The meta-analytic estimates were used to obtain control efficacy ( ), or percent disease reduction relative to the nontreated check. The absolute mean difference ( ) in yield (kg/ha) between the fungicide-treated and the nontreated check plots was also estimated. Yield response relative to the nontreated check ( ) was also calculated based on the difference in the logs of the means of yield between fungicide-treated and nontreated check. The TEBU, TEBU, and CARB treatments performed similarly with regards to control efficacy (= 59%, 53% and 55%, respectively), and although better than PROP (47%), the difference was marginally significant. Yield response ( ) was highest for TEBU, ( = 558 kg/ha, = 19.2%) followed by PROP (497 kg/ha, 16.0%), TEBU (457 kg/ha, 17.3%), and CARB (456 kg/ha, 12.8%). For an average 2016 scenario of fungicide plus application costs (F = $18 U.S./ha) and average wheat price (W = $215 U.S./MT), the probability of breaking even on the financial investment in the four treatments ranged from 59 to 63%. For 140 scenarios (four fungicides) created based on the combination of five W ($133 to 266 U.S./MT) and seven F ($5 to 35 U.S./ha), the probability of breaking even was >50% for all but two scenarios. The information may serve as a guide for planning future trials and provides a baseline and first step toward optimizing FHB management in Brazil.
三唑类和苯并咪唑类杀菌剂在过去二十多年中一直用于防治小麦赤霉病(FHB)。在巴西,直到过去五年才每年建立统一的杀菌剂防治 FHB 的试验,从而为该国提供了大量新的杀菌剂功效数据。对 2000 年以来在巴西进行的同行和非同行评议的化学控制研究进行了系统回顾。研究的杀菌剂包括三唑类戊唑醇(TEBU 和 TEBU)和丙环唑(PROP)以及苯并咪唑类杀菌剂多菌灵(CARB)。大多数杀菌剂施用两次,第一次在开花早期至中期,第二次在 7 至 10 天后。仅测试了 TEBU 一次或两次,因此评估了四种处理方法。对于这些杀菌剂,有 35 个试验报告了 FHB 指数,有 48 个试验报告了平均产量。对每个杀菌剂和未处理对照的 FHB 指数均值的对数进行了网络荟萃分析模型拟合。荟萃分析估计用于获得防治效果( ),即相对于未处理对照的疾病减少百分比。还估计了杀菌剂处理和未处理对照之间的产量(kg/ha)的绝对平均差异( )。还根据杀菌剂处理和未处理对照之间的产量均值对数的差异,计算了相对于未处理对照的产量响应( )。TEBU、TEBU 和 CARB 处理在防治效果方面表现相似(=59%、53%和 55%),尽管优于 PROP(47%),但差异具有边际显著性。TEBU 的产量响应( )最高,为 558kg/ha, 为 19.2%,其次是 PROP(497kg/ha, 为 16.0%)、TEBU(457kg/ha, 为 17.3%)和 CARB(456kg/ha, 为 12.8%)。对于 2016 年平均杀菌剂+施药成本(F = 18 美元/公顷)和平均小麦价格(W = 215 美元/吨)的情况,四种处理方法的财务投资收支平衡的概率范围为 59%至 63%。基于 5 个 W(133 至 266 美元/吨)和 7 个 F(5 至 35 美元/公顷)的 140 个情景(4 种杀菌剂)组合,除了两种情景外,所有情景的收支平衡概率均>50%。该信息可以作为规划未来试验的指南,并为巴西优化 FHB 管理提供基线和第一步。