• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绩效薪酬的支付频率是否重要?——一项随机试验的经验。

Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter?--Experience from a randomized trial.

机构信息

Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94301, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):553-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01072.x. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01072.x
PMID:20059568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2838160/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of incentive payment frequency on quality measures in a physician-specific pay-for-performance (P4P) experiment.

STUDY SETTING

A multispecialty physician group practice.

STUDY DESIGN

In 2007, all primary care physicians (n=179) were randomized into two study arms differing by the frequency of incentive payment, either four quarterly bonus checks or a single year-end bonus (maximum of U.S.$5,000/year for both arms).

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were extracted from electronic health records. Quality measure scores between the two arms over four quarters were compared.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There was no difference between the two arms in average quality measure score or in total bonus amount earned.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' responses to a P4P program with a small maximum bonus do not differ by frequency of bonus payment.

摘要

目的

在一项针对医生的按绩效付费(P4P)试验中,考察激励支付频率对质量指标的影响。

研究环境

一家多专科医生集团。

研究设计

2007 年,所有初级保健医生(n=179)被随机分为两组,激励支付频率不同,要么每季度发放四次奖金支票,要么年终发放一次奖金(两臂的奖金最高均为 5000 美元/年)。

数据收集/提取方法:从电子健康记录中提取数据。比较了两组在四个季度内的平均质量指标得分。

主要发现

两组之间的平均质量指标得分或总奖金收入没有差异。

结论

对于最高奖金数额较小的 P4P 计划,医生的反应与奖金支付频率无关。

相似文献

1
Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter?--Experience from a randomized trial.绩效薪酬的支付频率是否重要?——一项随机试验的经验。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):553-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01072.x. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
2
Design choices made by target users for a pay-for-performance program in primary care: an action research approach.目标用户在初级保健中为按绩效付费计划所做的设计选择:一种行动研究方法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 27;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-25.
3
Assessment of a pay-for-performance program in primary care designed by target users.目标用户设计的初级保健按绩效付费计划评估。
Fam Pract. 2013 Apr;30(2):161-71. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms055. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
4
Does pay-for-performance design matter? Evidence from Brazil.按绩效付费设计是否重要?来自巴西的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):593-602. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae025.
5
Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice.绩效薪酬的早期经验:从概念到实践。
JAMA. 2005 Oct 12;294(14):1788-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1788.
6
Effect of Financial Bonus Size, Loss Aversion, and Increased Social Pressure on Physician Pay-for-Performance: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Cohort Study.财务奖金规模、损失规避和增加社会压力对医生按绩效付费的影响:一项随机临床试验和队列研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187950. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7950.
7
Does winning a pay-for-performance bonus improve subsequent quality performance? Evidence from the Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration.赢得按绩效付费奖金是否能提高后续的质量绩效?来自医院质量激励示范的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr;49(2):568-87. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12097. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
8
Effect of physician-specific pay-for-performance incentives in a large group practice.医师个体绩效薪酬激励对大型团体执业的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Feb 1;16(2):e35-42.
9
Effect on hospital incentive payments and quality performance of a hospital pay for performance (P4P) programme in Belgium.比利时医院按绩效付费(P4P)计划对医院激励支付和质量绩效的影响。
J Healthc Qual Res. 2024 May-Jun;39(3):147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
10
Evaluating a Pay-for-Performance Program for Medicaid Children in an Accountable Care Organization.评价在一个责任医疗组织中针对医疗补助儿童的按绩效付费计划。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Mar;170(3):259-66. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3809.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care providers' preferences for pay-for-performance programs: a discrete choice experiment study in Shandong China.基层医疗服务提供者对按绩效付费项目的偏好:来自中国山东的一项离散选择实验研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Mar 12;22(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00903-2.
2
Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings.医疗机构中从事门诊医疗服务人员的付费方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 20;1(1):CD011865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011865.pub2.
3
A reporting framework for describing and a typology for categorizing and analyzing the designs of health care pay for performance schemes.一个用于描述医疗保健绩效薪酬计划设计的报告框架以及用于对其进行分类和分析的类型学。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3479-x.
4
Design and effects of outcome-based payment models in healthcare: a systematic review.基于结果的医疗保健支付模式的设计和效果:系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):217-232. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0989-8. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
5
Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.衡量医疗保健价值导向型采购计划的成效:环境扫描、文献综述及专家小组讨论的结果
Rand Health Q. 2014 Dec 30;4(3):9.
6
Heterogeneity in general practitioners' preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France.全科医生对质量改进计划偏好的异质性:法国的选择实验和政策模拟。
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0121-7. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?绩效薪酬:令人失望的结果还是隐藏的异质性?
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Feb;74(1):3-78. doi: 10.1177/1077558715619282. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.药品政策:针对开处方者的经济激励措施的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.
9
The ABCs of incentive-based treatment in health care: a behavior analytic framework to inform research and practice.医疗保健中基于激励的治疗基础:一个为研究和实践提供信息的行为分析框架。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Mar 19;7:103-14. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S59792. eCollection 2014.
10
Pay for performance for salaried health care providers: methodology, challenges, and pitfalls.为受薪医疗服务提供者的绩效付费:方法、挑战与陷阱。
Perm J. 2014 Winter;18(1):78-85. doi: 10.7812/TPP/13-087.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of physician-specific pay-for-performance incentives in a large group practice.医师个体绩效薪酬激励对大型团体执业的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Feb 1;16(2):e35-42.
2
Patient outcomes and evidence-based medicine in a preferred provider organization setting: a six-year evaluation of a physician pay-for-performance program.优选医疗机构环境下的患者预后与循证医学:一项针对医师绩效薪酬计划的六年评估
Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec;42(6 Pt 1):2140-59; discussion 2294-323. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00725.x.
3
Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?按绩效付费能提高医疗保健质量吗?
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):265-72. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00006.
4
Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.英国全科医疗中的绩效薪酬计划。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 27;355(4):375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa055505.
5
Impact of pay-for-performance contracts and network registry on diabetes and asthma HEDIS measures in an integrated delivery network.绩效薪酬合同和网络登记对综合医疗服务网络中糖尿病和哮喘医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)指标的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Feb;63(1 Suppl):14S-28S. doi: 10.1177/1077558705284057.
6
Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice.绩效薪酬的早期经验:从概念到实践。
JAMA. 2005 Oct 12;294(14):1788-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1788.
7
Putting smart money to work for quality improvement.让行家为质量改进发挥作用。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 1):1318-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00414.x.
8
The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines.经济激励措施和患者登记系统对预防保健质量的影响:提高医疗服务提供者对循证戒烟实践指南的依从性。
Prev Med. 2003 Mar;36(3):291-9. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00052-x.
9
Paying for quality improvement: compliance with tobacco cessation guidelines.为质量改进买单:遵守戒烟指南。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Feb;29(2):59-65. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29008-0.
10
The use of physician financial incentives and feedback to improve pediatric preventive care in Medicaid managed care.利用医生经济激励措施和反馈来改善医疗补助管理式医疗中的儿科预防保健。
Pediatrics. 1999 Oct;104(4 Pt 1):931-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.4.931.