Suppr超能文献

直觉和猜测在 SRT 任务生成中的区别:对诺曼和普赖斯的回复。

The distinction between intuition and guessing in the SRT task generation: a reply to Norman and Price.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):478-80. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

Abstract

We (Fu, Dienes, & Fu, 2010) investigated the extent to which people could generate sequences of responses based on knowledge acquired from the Serial Reaction Time task, depending on whether it felt subjectively like the response was based on pure guessing, intuition, conscious rules or memories. Norman and Price (2010) argued that in the context of our task, intuition responses were the same as guessing responses. In reply, we argue that not only do subjects apparently claim to be experiencing different phenomenologies when saying intuition versus guess, but also intuition and guess responses are associated with different behaviors. We found that people could control the knowledge when generating responses felt to be based on intuition but not those felt to be pure guessing. We present further evidence here that triplets associated with intuition but not guessing were also processed fluently.

摘要

我们(Fu、Dienes 和 Fu,2010)研究了人们在多大程度上可以根据从连续反应时间任务中获得的知识生成反应序列,具体取决于反应是否主观上感觉是基于纯粹的猜测、直觉、有意识的规则还是记忆。Norman 和 Price(2010)认为,在我们的任务背景下,直觉反应与猜测反应相同。作为回应,我们认为,当被试说直觉与猜测时,他们显然不仅声称正在经历不同的现象,而且直觉和猜测反应与不同的行为相关联。我们发现,人们可以在生成感觉基于直觉的反应时控制知识,但不能在生成感觉是纯粹猜测的反应时控制知识。我们在这里提供了进一步的证据,表明与直觉相关的三连体而不是猜测被流畅地处理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验