U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Mar;76(5):1359-66. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02033-09. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
There are numerous PCR-based assays available to characterize bovine fecal pollution in ambient waters. The determination of which approaches are most suitable for field applications can be difficult because each assay targets a different gene, in many cases from different microorganisms, leading to variation in assay performance. We describe a performance evaluation of seven end-point PCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays reported to be associated with either ruminant or bovine feces. Each assay was tested against a reference collection of DNA extracts from 247 individual bovine fecal samples representing 11 different populations and 175 fecal DNA extracts from 24 different animal species. Bovine-associated genetic markers were broadly distributed among individual bovine samples ranging from 39 to 93%. Specificity levels of the assays spanned 47.4% to 100%. End-point PCR sensitivity also varied between assays and among different bovine populations. For qPCR assays, the abundance of each host-associated genetic marker was measured within each bovine population and compared to results of a qPCR assay targeting 16S rRNA gene sequences from Bacteroidales. Experiments indicate large discrepancies in the performance of bovine-associated assays across different bovine populations. Variability in assay performance between host populations suggests that the use of bovine microbial source-tracking applications will require a priori characterization at each watershed of interest.
有许多基于 PCR 的检测方法可用于描述环境水中的牛粪便污染。确定哪些方法最适合野外应用可能很困难,因为每种检测方法都针对不同的基因,在许多情况下来自不同的微生物,导致检测方法的性能存在差异。我们描述了七种终点 PCR 和实时定量 PCR(qPCR)检测方法的性能评估,这些方法被认为与反刍动物或牛粪便有关。每个检测方法都针对一个包含 247 个个体牛粪便样本的参考 DNA 提取物进行了测试,这些样本代表了 11 个不同的种群,还有来自 24 个不同动物物种的 175 个粪便 DNA 提取物。牛相关的遗传标记在个体牛样本中广泛分布,范围从 39%到 93%。检测方法的特异性水平从 47.4%到 100%不等。终点 PCR 的敏感性也在不同的检测方法和不同的牛种群之间有所差异。对于 qPCR 检测方法,在每个牛种群中测量了每个宿主相关遗传标记的丰度,并与针对 Bacteroidales 16S rRNA 基因序列的 qPCR 检测方法的结果进行了比较。实验表明,不同牛种群中牛相关检测方法的性能存在很大差异。宿主种群之间检测方法性能的差异表明,在每个感兴趣的流域,使用牛微生物源追踪应用程序都需要事先进行特征描述。