• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Performance assessment PCR-based assays targeting bacteroidales genetic markers of bovine fecal pollution.基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测方法对牛粪便污染的拟杆菌门遗传标记进行性能评估。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Mar;76(5):1359-66. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02033-09. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
2
Quantitative identification of fecal water pollution sources by TaqMan real-time PCR assays using Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers.利用 Bacteroidales 16S rRNA 遗传标记的 TaqMan 实时 PCR 分析法定量鉴定粪便水污染来源。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Dec;88(6):1373-83. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2880-0. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
3
Evaluation of swine-specific PCR assays used for fecal source tracking and analysis of molecular diversity of swine-specific "bacteroidales" populations.用于粪便来源追踪的猪特异性聚合酶链反应检测方法的评估以及猪特异性“拟杆菌目”菌群分子多样性分析。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Sep;75(18):5787-96. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00448-09. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
4
Estimation of pig fecal contamination in a river catchment by real-time PCR using two pig-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers.使用两种猪特异性拟杆菌纲16S rRNA基因标记通过实时PCR法估算河流集水区中的猪粪便污染情况。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 May;75(10):3045-54. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02343-08. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
5
Improving the performance of an end-point PCR assay commonly used for the detection of Bacteroidales pertaining to cow feces.提高终点 PCR 检测方法在检测牛粪便中相关拟杆菌门的性能。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Feb;93(4):1703-13. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3782-5. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
6
Comparison of PCR and quantitative real-time PCR methods for the characterization of ruminant and cattle fecal pollution sources.比较聚合酶链反应(PCR)和实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)方法在反刍动物和牛粪便污染源特征分析中的应用。
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6921-8. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.061. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
7
Phylogenetic analysis of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from human and animal effluents and assessment of ruminant faecal pollution by real-time PCR.从人和动物污水中提取的拟杆菌门 16S rRNA 基因序列的系统发育分析,以及实时 PCR 评估反刍动物粪便污染。
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Mar;108(3):974-984. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04499.x. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
8
Performance of PCR-based assays targeting Bacteroidales genetic markers of human fecal pollution in sewage and fecal samples.基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测方法在污水和粪便样本中检测人粪便污染的拟杆菌门遗传标记的性能。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Aug 15;44(16):6281-8. doi: 10.1021/es100311n.
9
Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.评估宿主特异性拟杆菌目16S rRNA基因标记作为检测草原流域粪便污染的补充工具。
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4838-49. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.045. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
10
Evaluation of genetic markers from the 16S rRNA gene V2 region for use in quantitative detection of selected Bacteroidales species and human fecal waste by qPCR.评估 16S rRNA 基因 V2 区的遗传标记,用于通过 qPCR 定量检测选定的拟杆菌目物种和人粪便废物。
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;33(6):348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Distribution of host-specific Bacteriodales marker genes in water sources of selected rural areas of Vhembe District, South Africa.南非威姆比地区选定农村地区水源中宿主特异性杆菌目标记基因的分布。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 26;14(1):19758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68771-3.
2
An overview of molecular markers for identification of non-human fecal pollution sources.用于识别非人类粪便污染源的分子标记概述。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1256174. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1256174. eCollection 2023.
3
The Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus Movement Protein Gene Is a Novel Microbial Source Tracking Marker.番茄褐色皱果病毒运动蛋白基因是一种新型微生物源追踪标记物。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023 Jul 26;89(7):e0058323. doi: 10.1128/aem.00583-23. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Have genetic targets for faecal pollution diagnostics and source tracking revolutionized water quality analysis yet?粪便污染诊断和溯源的遗传靶标是否已经彻底改变了水质分析?
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2023 Jul 5;47(4). doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad028.
5
Tomato brown rugose fruit virus Mo gene is a novel microbial source tracking marker.番茄褐色皱纹果病毒Mo基因是一种新型的微生物源追踪标记。
bioRxiv. 2023 Jan 10:2023.01.09.523366. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.09.523366.
6
Genetic fecal source identification in urban streams impacted by municipal separate storm sewer system discharges.城市溪流中受市政雨水单独排放系统影响的遗传粪便源识别。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0278548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278548. eCollection 2023.
7
Microbial Source Tracking as a Method of Determination of Beach Sand Contamination.微生物源追踪作为一种确定海滩沙污染的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;19(13):7934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137934.
8
Microbial Source Tracking of Fecal Indicating Bacteria in Coral Reef Waters, Recreational Waters, and Groundwater of Saipan by Real-Time Quantitative PCR.通过实时定量PCR对塞班岛珊瑚礁水域、娱乐用水和地下水中粪便指示菌进行微生物源追踪
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 18;11:596650. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.596650. eCollection 2020.
9
Application of molecular source tracking and mass balance approach to identify potential sources of fecal indicator bacteria in a tropical river.应用分子溯源和质量平衡方法识别热带河流中粪便指示菌的潜在来源。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232054. eCollection 2020.
10
Evidence of Genetic Fecal Marker Interactions between Water Column and Periphyton in Artificial Streams.人工溪流中水柱与附生植物之间遗传粪便标志物相互作用的证据。
ACS Omega. 2018 Aug 29;3(8):10107-10113. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01785. eCollection 2018 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of tetramethylrhodamine and black hole quencher 1 labeled probes and five commercial amplification mixes in TaqMan real-time RT-PCR assays for respiratory pathogens.评价四甲基罗丹明和黑洞猝灭剂 1 标记探针以及五种商业扩增混合物在 TaqMan 实时 RT-PCR 检测呼吸道病原体中的应用。
J Virol Methods. 2009 Dec;162(1-2):288-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
2
Temporal assessment of the impact of exposure to cow feces in two watersheds by multiple host-specific PCR assays.通过多种宿主特异性聚合酶链反应检测对两个流域中接触牛粪的影响进行时间评估。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Nov;74(22):6839-47. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00601-08. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
3
A Bayesian method for calculating real-time quantitative PCR calibration curves using absolute plasmid DNA standards.一种使用绝对质粒DNA标准品计算实时定量PCR校准曲线的贝叶斯方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Feb 25;9:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-120.
4
A discrete, stochastic model and correction method for bacterial source tracking.一种用于细菌源追踪的离散随机模型及校正方法。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jan 15;42(2):524-9. doi: 10.1021/es070943x.
5
Improved real-time PCR assays for the detection of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters with different instrument and reagent systems.用于检测不同仪器和试剂系统地表水粪便指示菌的改进型实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应检测方法。
J Water Health. 2008 Jun;6(2):225-37. doi: 10.2166/wh.2008.022.
6
Quantitative PCR for detection and enumeration of genetic markers of bovine fecal pollution.用于检测和计数牛粪便污染基因标记的定量聚合酶链式反应
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Feb;74(3):745-52. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01843-07. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
7
16S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: a Bayesian approach.基于16S rRNA的通用、人源、牛源和犬源特异性粪便拟杆菌定量检测分析:一种贝叶斯方法
Water Res. 2007 Aug;41(16):3701-15. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.037. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
8
Detection of Bacteroidales fecal indicators and the zoonotic pathogens E. coli 0157:H7, salmonella, and campylobacter in river water.河水样本中拟杆菌粪便指示菌以及人畜共患病原体大肠杆菌O157:H7、沙门氏菌和弯曲杆菌的检测。
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Mar 15;41(6):1856-62. doi: 10.1021/es0620989.
9
Identification of bacterial DNA markers for the detection of human fecal pollution in water.用于检测水中人类粪便污染的细菌DNA标记物的鉴定
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Apr;73(8):2416-22. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02474-06. Epub 2007 Jan 5.
10
Multiplex quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for F+-specific RNA coliphages: a method for use in microbial source tracking.用于F+特异性RNA噬菌体的多重定量实时逆转录PCR:一种用于微生物源追踪的方法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Feb;73(3):808-14. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00399-06. Epub 2006 Dec 1.

基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测方法对牛粪便污染的拟杆菌门遗传标记进行性能评估。

Performance assessment PCR-based assays targeting bacteroidales genetic markers of bovine fecal pollution.

机构信息

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Mar;76(5):1359-66. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02033-09. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1128/AEM.02033-09
PMID:20061457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2832389/
Abstract

There are numerous PCR-based assays available to characterize bovine fecal pollution in ambient waters. The determination of which approaches are most suitable for field applications can be difficult because each assay targets a different gene, in many cases from different microorganisms, leading to variation in assay performance. We describe a performance evaluation of seven end-point PCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays reported to be associated with either ruminant or bovine feces. Each assay was tested against a reference collection of DNA extracts from 247 individual bovine fecal samples representing 11 different populations and 175 fecal DNA extracts from 24 different animal species. Bovine-associated genetic markers were broadly distributed among individual bovine samples ranging from 39 to 93%. Specificity levels of the assays spanned 47.4% to 100%. End-point PCR sensitivity also varied between assays and among different bovine populations. For qPCR assays, the abundance of each host-associated genetic marker was measured within each bovine population and compared to results of a qPCR assay targeting 16S rRNA gene sequences from Bacteroidales. Experiments indicate large discrepancies in the performance of bovine-associated assays across different bovine populations. Variability in assay performance between host populations suggests that the use of bovine microbial source-tracking applications will require a priori characterization at each watershed of interest.

摘要

有许多基于 PCR 的检测方法可用于描述环境水中的牛粪便污染。确定哪些方法最适合野外应用可能很困难,因为每种检测方法都针对不同的基因,在许多情况下来自不同的微生物,导致检测方法的性能存在差异。我们描述了七种终点 PCR 和实时定量 PCR(qPCR)检测方法的性能评估,这些方法被认为与反刍动物或牛粪便有关。每个检测方法都针对一个包含 247 个个体牛粪便样本的参考 DNA 提取物进行了测试,这些样本代表了 11 个不同的种群,还有来自 24 个不同动物物种的 175 个粪便 DNA 提取物。牛相关的遗传标记在个体牛样本中广泛分布,范围从 39%到 93%。检测方法的特异性水平从 47.4%到 100%不等。终点 PCR 的敏感性也在不同的检测方法和不同的牛种群之间有所差异。对于 qPCR 检测方法,在每个牛种群中测量了每个宿主相关遗传标记的丰度,并与针对 Bacteroidales 16S rRNA 基因序列的 qPCR 检测方法的结果进行了比较。实验表明,不同牛种群中牛相关检测方法的性能存在很大差异。宿主种群之间检测方法性能的差异表明,在每个感兴趣的流域,使用牛微生物源追踪应用程序都需要事先进行特征描述。