Suppr超能文献

阅读障碍的计算建模:评 Wool-lams、Lambon Ralph、Plaut 和 Patterson(2007 年)。

Computational modeling of reading in semantic dementia: comment on Woollams, Lambon Ralph, Plaut, and Patterson (2007).

机构信息

Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):256-71; discussion 271-2. doi: 10.1037/a0015948.

Abstract

Woollams, Lambon Ralph, Plaut, and Patterson reported detailed data on reading in 51 cases of semantic dementia. They simulated some aspects of these data using a connectionist parallel distributed processing (PDP) triangle model of reading. We argue here that a different model of reading, the dual route cascaded (DRC) model of Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, and Ziegler (2001), not only provides a more accurate simulation of these aspects of reading in semantic dementia than does the PDP model but also provides highly accurate simulations of other aspects of reading in this disorder that the PDP approach has not simulated. We conclude that our findings add to evidence both from simulations of normal skilled reading and from simulations of other kinds of acquired dyslexia that the nonconnectionist DRC model of reading offers a better account of normal and disordered reading than the connectionist PDP models of reading.

摘要

沃拉姆、兰本·拉尔夫、普劳特和帕特森报告了语义性痴呆 51 例阅读的详细数据。他们使用连接主义平行分布式处理(PDP)三角形阅读模型模拟了这些数据的某些方面。在这里,我们认为,与 PDP 模型相比,阅读的另一种模型——科特哈特、拉斯勒、佩里、兰登和齐格勒(2001)的双重通路级联(DRC)模型不仅更准确地模拟了语义性痴呆阅读的这些方面,而且还高度准确地模拟了 PDP 方法未模拟的该障碍中阅读的其他方面。我们的结论是,我们的发现增加了来自正常熟练阅读模拟和其他获得性阅读障碍模拟的证据,即非连接主义的 DRC 阅读模型比连接主义的 PDP 阅读模型更能解释正常和障碍阅读。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验