• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CDP++:在意象文字中对次词汇和超词汇的不一致性进行建模。

CDP++.Italian: modelling sublexical and supralexical inconsistency in a shallow orthography.

机构信息

Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.

Aix-Marseille Université and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e94291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094291. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0094291
PMID:24740261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3989230/
Abstract

Most models of reading aloud have been constructed to explain data in relatively complex orthographies like English and French. Here, we created an Italian version of the Connectionist Dual Process Model of Reading Aloud (CDP++) to examine the extent to which the model could predict data in a language which has relatively simple orthography-phonology relationships but is relatively complex at a suprasegmental (word stress) level. We show that the model exhibits good quantitative performance and accounts for key phenomena observed in naming studies, including some apparently contradictory findings. These effects include stress regularity and stress consistency, both of which have been especially important in studies of word recognition and reading aloud in Italian. Overall, the results of the model compare favourably to an alternative connectionist model that can learn non-linear spelling-to-sound mappings. This suggests that CDP++ is currently the leading computational model of reading aloud in Italian, and that its simple linear learning mechanism adequately captures the statistical regularities of the spelling-to-sound mapping both at the segmental and supra-segmental levels.

摘要

大多数朗读 aloud 的模型都是为了解释相对复杂的 orthographies 中的数据而构建的,如英语和法语。在这里,我们创建了意大利语版的朗读 aloud 的连接主义双重过程模型(CDP++),以检验该模型在何种程度上可以预测具有相对简单的 orthography-phonology 关系但在超音段(单词重音)水平上相对复杂的语言的数据。我们表明,该模型表现出良好的定量性能,并解释了在命名研究中观察到的关键现象,包括一些明显矛盾的发现。这些效应包括重音规则性和重音一致性,它们在意大利语的单词识别和朗读 aloud 研究中尤为重要。总的来说,该模型的结果与能够学习非线性拼写-发音映射的替代连接主义模型相比表现良好。这表明,CDP++ 是目前意大利语朗读 aloud 的领先计算模型,其简单的线性学习机制充分捕捉了拼写-发音映射在音段和超音段水平上的统计规律性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/44ad20d57a2c/pone.0094291.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/4a7ac164f95e/pone.0094291.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/9545ea6e5eac/pone.0094291.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/4ddaeb779330/pone.0094291.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/44ad20d57a2c/pone.0094291.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/4a7ac164f95e/pone.0094291.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/9545ea6e5eac/pone.0094291.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/4ddaeb779330/pone.0094291.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f79/3989230/44ad20d57a2c/pone.0094291.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
CDP++.Italian: modelling sublexical and supralexical inconsistency in a shallow orthography.CDP++:在意象文字中对次词汇和超词汇的不一致性进行建模。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e94291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094291. eCollection 2014.
2
Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.超越单音节:使用连接主义双过程 (CDP++) 模型进行大规模朗读建模。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):106-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 26.
3
Effects of Orthographic Consistency on Bilingual Reading: Human and Computer Simulation Data.正字法一致性对双语阅读的影响:人类与计算机模拟数据
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 30;11(7):878. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070878.
4
The locus of serial processing in reading aloud: orthography-to-phonology computation or speech planning?大声朗读中串行加工的位点:正字法到音系的计算还是言语计划?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(4):1076-99. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000090. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
5
Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?当前的联结主义学习模型是否能解释不同语言中的阅读发展情况?
Cognition. 2004 Apr;91(3):273-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.006.
6
On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an "outlier" orthography.论当前阅读研究与实践中的英语中心主义:过度依赖一种“异常”正字法的风险。
Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;134(4):584-615. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584.
7
The effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: a study on Italian children.词形对拼写和阅读准确性的影响:一项针对意大利儿童的研究。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 19;5:1373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01373. eCollection 2014.
8
Functional neuroanatomy of reading in Czech: Evidence of a dual-route processing architecture in a shallow orthography.捷克语阅读的功能神经解剖学:浅正字法中双路径加工架构的证据
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 16;13:1037365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037365. eCollection 2022.
9
Orthographic consistency influences morphological processing in reading aloud: Evidence from a cross-linguistic study.正字法一致性对大声朗读中的形态加工有影响:一项跨语言研究的证据。
Dev Sci. 2020 Nov;23(6):e12952. doi: 10.1111/desc.12952. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
The interaction of lexical and sublexical processes in reading, writing and repetition.
Neuropsychologia. 1994 Mar;32(3):317-33. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90134-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Same same but different: The graded influence of vowel quality and prosodic prominence on letter detection.形似实异:元音质量和韵律重音对字母识别的分级影响
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Sep;78(9):1909-1920. doi: 10.1177/17470218241293742. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
Using Monte-Carlo simulation to test predictions about the time-course of semantic and lexical access in reading.使用蒙特卡罗模拟来测试阅读中语义和词汇通达时间进程的预测。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0296874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296874. eCollection 2024.
3
Using electrophysiological correlates of early semantic priming to test models of reading aloud.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: implications for dyslexia.通过语音解码和自我教学来模拟阅读发展:对阅读障碍的启示。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 9;369(1634):20120397. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0397. Print 2014.
2
Word, pseudoword, and nonword processing: a multitask comparison using event-related brain potentials.词、假词和非词处理:使用事件相关脑电位的多任务比较。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):758-75. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.758.
3
A computational and empirical investigation of graphemes in reading.
利用早期语义启动的电生理学相关性来测试朗读模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 28;12(1):5224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09279-6.
4
What Is Going on with Visual Attention in Reading and Dyslexia? A Critical Review of Recent Studies.阅读与阅读障碍中的视觉注意力是怎么回事?近期研究的批判性综述。
Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):87. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12010087.
5
Effects of Orthographic Consistency on Bilingual Reading: Human and Computer Simulation Data.正字法一致性对双语阅读的影响:人类与计算机模拟数据
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 30;11(7):878. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070878.
6
Local perception impairs the lexical reading route.局部感知会损害词汇阅读路径。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1748-1756. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01326-z. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
7
Reading Derived Words by Italian Children With and Without Dyslexia: The Effect of Root Length.有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍的意大利儿童对派生词的阅读:词根长度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 8;9:647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00647. eCollection 2018.
8
Early markers of lexical stress in visual word recognition.视觉单词识别中词汇重音的早期标记。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Nov;45(8):1398-1410. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0735-y.
9
Introduction to the Special Issue: Advancing the State-of-the-Science in Reading Research through Modeling.特刊引言:通过建模推进阅读研究的科学现状
Sci Stud Read. 2016;20(1):1-5. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1118480.
10
The segment-to-frame association in word reading: early effects of the interaction between segmental and suprasegmental information.单词阅读中的音段与音节关联:音段与超音段信息交互作用的早期影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 20;6:1612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01612. eCollection 2015.
阅读中字母的计算和实证研究。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;37(5):800-28. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12030. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
4
Stress assignment in reading Italian polysyllabic pseudowords.阅读意大利多音节伪词时的压力分配。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):51-68. doi: 10.1037/a0028472. Epub 2012 May 21.
5
Reading aloud pseudohomophones in Italian: always an advantage.朗读意大利语中的拟声词:总是有优势的。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Apr;40(3):466-82. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0161-5.
6
Phonological dyslexia without phonological impairment?语音型阅读障碍而无语音损伤?
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Dec 1;21(8):820-39. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000465.
7
Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.超越单音节:使用连接主义双过程 (CDP++) 模型进行大规模朗读建模。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):106-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 26.
8
Simulating Language-specific and Language-general Effects in a Statistical Learning Model of Chinese Reading.在中国阅读统计学习模型中模拟特定语言和通用语言效应
J Mem Lang. 2009 Aug 2;61(2):238-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.001.
9
Computational modeling of reading in semantic dementia: comment on Woollams, Lambon Ralph, Plaut, and Patterson (2007).阅读障碍的计算建模:评 Wool-lams、Lambon Ralph、Plaut 和 Patterson(2007 年)。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):256-71; discussion 271-2. doi: 10.1037/a0015948.
10
Stress priming in reading and the selective modulation of lexical and sub-lexical pathways.阅读中的应激启动与词汇和亚词汇通路的选择性调制。
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 29;4(9):e7219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007219.