Suppr超能文献

对用于诊断“脑死亡”的窒息氧合试验的评价。

A critique of the apneic oxygenation test for the diagnosis of "brain death".

机构信息

Intensive Care Physician and Resuscitation Officer, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul;11(4):475-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181ce75dd.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability and safety of the apneic oxygenation test to diagnose brain death for the purpose of organ donation.

DATE SOURCES

Published scientific literature in Medline database, organ donation guidelines and neurophysiological principles described in medical textbooks.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles on brain death, apnea testing, and radionuclide scintigraphy.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Hypercarbia with a target Paco2 of 60 mm Hg (8.0 kPa) must be reached before apnea is deemed consistent with brain death in some clinical guidelines, whereas a level of 50 mm Hg (6.7 kPa) is required in another. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the test are doubtful because some patients have commenced spontaneous respiration >60 mm Hg (8.0 kPa) and high levels of Paco2 may cause CO2 narcosis. Furthermore, the test may be harmful if the brain stem is responsive because hypercarbia may also cause intracranial hypertension and contribute to brain damage. Although guidelines for organ donation recommend the test as an essential component of brain death diagnosis, it is often not performed or performed inadequately. Wide variation in conduct of the test has prompted calls for standardization.

CONCLUSIONS

: The apneic oxygenation test is unreliable in the diagnosis of brain death. It is scientifically flawed and hypothesized to cause brain death. In lieu of this test, a reliable test of brain perfusion should be mandatory, whereas the apneic oxygenation test, if performed at all, should be restricted to demonstration of apnea after brain perfusion has been shown to be absent.

摘要

目的

为了进行器官捐献,确定窒息氧合试验诊断脑死亡的可靠性和安全性。

资料来源

在 Medline 数据库中发表的科学文献、器官捐献指南以及医学教科书中描述的神经生理学原理。

研究选择

脑死亡、窒息试验和放射性核素闪烁扫描方面的文章。

资料提取和综合

一些临床指南规定,在认为窒息与脑死亡一致之前,必须使二氧化碳分压(Paco2)达到 60mmHg(8.0kPa)的高碳酸血症,但在另一些指南中则需要达到 50mmHg(6.7kPa)。然而,由于一些患者在 Paco2 超过 60mmHg(8.0kPa)时已经开始自主呼吸,而且高水平的 Paco2 可能导致 CO2 麻醉,因此该试验的敏感性和特异性值得怀疑。此外,如果脑干有反应,该试验可能有害,因为高碳酸血症也可能导致颅内压升高并导致脑损伤。尽管器官捐献指南建议将该试验作为脑死亡诊断的重要组成部分,但该试验通常未进行或进行不足。该试验的实施存在广泛差异,因此呼吁标准化。

结论

在脑死亡的诊断中,窒息氧合试验是不可靠的。它在科学上存在缺陷,并假设会导致脑死亡。在没有该试验的情况下,应强制使用可靠的脑灌注试验,而如果进行该试验,则应仅限于在证明脑灌注缺失后进行窒息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验