Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):836-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01988-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production in Gram-negative bacilli is an increasing problem worldwide. Rectal swab surveillance is recommended as a component of infection prevention programs, yet few screening methods are published. We compared detection of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in surveillance specimens by 2 methods: (i) inoculation of swabs in tryptic soy broth containing 2 microg/ml imipenem followed by plating to MacConkey agar (MAC) (method 1) and (ii) streaking swabs on MAC onto which a 10-microg ertapenem disk was then placed (method 2). Simulated rectal swab specimens of challenge isolates from a collection of well-characterized K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains and salvage rectal swab specimens collected from patients at 4 different health care facilities over a 7-month period were tested. The gold-standard comparator was bla(KPC) PCR testing of isolates. Method 1 detected 4/9 (44%) KPC-positive challenge isolates. By method 2, 9/9 KPC-positive challenge isolates exhibited zones of inhibition of < or = 27 mm; all KPC-negative isolates exhibited zones of inhibition greater than 27 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of method 1 for detection of KPC-positive K. pneumoniae and E. coli in 149 rectal swab specimens were 65.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.8% to 80.8%) and 49.6% (95% CI, 40.3% to 58.9%), respectively. With method 2, a zone diameter of < or = 27 mm had a sensitivity of 97.0% (95% CI, 82.5% to 99.8%) and specificity of 90.5% (95% CI, 83.3% to 94.9%) for detection of KPC in rectal swab specimens. Direct ertapenem disk testing is simpler, more sensitive, and more specific than selective broth enrichment with imipenem for detection of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli in surveillance specimens.
产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌(KPC)在革兰氏阴性菌中的产生是一个在全球范围内不断增加的问题。直肠拭子监测被推荐作为感染预防计划的一个组成部分,但发表的筛查方法很少。我们比较了 2 种方法检测监测标本中产 KPC 肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌:(i)将拭子接种于含有 2μg/ml 亚胺培南的胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤中,然后接种于麦康凯琼脂(MAC)(方法 1),和(ii)将拭子划线接种于 MAC 上,然后在其上放置 10μg 厄他培南纸片(方法 2)。对从一组特征明确的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌菌株中收集的模拟直肠拭子挑战分离株和 4 家不同医疗机构在 7 个月期间收集的直肠拭子抢救分离株进行了检测。金标准对照物是分离物的 bla(KPC)PCR 检测。方法 1 检测到 9 个 KPC 阳性挑战分离株中的 4 个(44%)。通过方法 2,9 个 KPC 阳性挑战分离株显示出抑制区<或=27mm;所有 KPC 阴性分离株的抑制区均大于 27mm。方法 1 检测 149 份直肠拭子标本中 KPC 阳性肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌的敏感性和特异性分别为 65.6%(95%可信区间[CI],46.8%至 80.8%)和 49.6%(95%CI,40.3%至 58.9%)。用方法 2,直径<或=27mm 的区域检测直肠拭子标本中 KPC 的敏感性为 97.0%(95%CI,82.5%至 99.8%),特异性为 90.5%(95%CI,83.3%至 94.9%)。直接厄他培南纸片检测比选择性亚胺培南肉汤富集更简单、更敏感、更特异,用于检测监测标本中产 KPC 的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌。