Department of Surgery and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Caritas-Clinic St. Josef, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Feb;395(2):181-3. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0556-y.
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has been proved in various studies. The minimal invasive procedure is feasible and safe which was demonstrated in many studies. However, the results of prospective, randomized studies providing valuable evidence are still not available. Compared to conventional surgery, the laparoscopic technique has short-term advantages including less pain, shorter duration of postoperative ileus, less fatigue, better pulmonary function, and less blood loss (Leung et al., Lancet 363:1187-1192, 2004; Braga et al., Dis Colon Rectum 48:217-223, 2005; Jayne et al., J Clin Oncol 25:3061-3068, 2007; Agha et al., Surg Endosc 22:2229-2237, 2008).
The autonomic nerve sparing TME technique is the gold standard in rectal cancer resection even in conventional or laparoscopic procedure. With regard of the oncological dimension, the laparoscopic TME technique is not different compared to the open procedure. However, a standardized laparoscopic step-by-step procedure may simplify the operation and can reduce operation time.
There are no studies available which compare different types of TME procedures. Most surgeons start the operation left laterally mobilizing the sigmoid colon first. In the laparoscopic technique, we recommend the medial to lateral approach starting the operation at the right side of the rectum and sigmoid colon. A nerve sparing TME technique can be performed easier, and the identification of the left ureter may be simplified. After multiple workshops and extensive discussion with national and international experts, we developed a standardized laparoscopic "10 step TME procedure." Reviewing the results of laparoscopic TME the studies do not allow firm conclusions as to the questions of whether the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic TME is equal or superior to open TME (Breukink et al. 2006). Actually, we are waiting for large prospective randomized studies comparing laparoscopic TME with the traditional open procedure (Bonjer et al., Dan Med Bull 56:89-91, 2009).
Laparoscopic TME appears to have clinically measurable short-term advantages in patients with primary resectable rectal cancer based on evidence mainly from nonrandomized studies (Breukink et al. 5). In nearly all published studies, the efficacy and technical feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer could be demonstrated regarding perioperative morbidity and oncological outcome. A standardized laparoscopic TME technique can be strongly recommended.
腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(TME)已在多项研究中得到证实。许多研究表明,这种微创方法是可行且安全的。然而,目前仍然缺乏提供有价值证据的前瞻性、随机研究结果。与传统手术相比,腹腔镜技术具有短期优势,包括疼痛减轻、术后肠梗阻持续时间缩短、疲劳减少、肺功能更好和出血量减少(Leung 等人,柳叶刀 363:1187-1192, 2004;Braga 等人,结直肠疾病 48:217-223, 2005;Jayne 等人,临床肿瘤学杂志 25:3061-3068, 2007;Agha 等人,手术内镜 22:2229-2237, 2008)。
自主神经保留 TME 技术是直肠肿瘤切除的金标准,即使在传统或腹腔镜手术中也是如此。就肿瘤学方面而言,腹腔镜 TME 技术与开放手术并无不同。然而,标准化的腹腔镜分步手术可以简化操作并缩短手术时间。
目前尚无比较不同 TME 手术类型的研究。大多数外科医生从左侧开始侧向移动乙状结肠。在腹腔镜技术中,我们建议采用从直肠和乙状结肠右侧开始的内侧至外侧方法。神经保留 TME 技术更容易实施,左侧输尿管的识别也可以简化。在多次研讨会和与国内外专家广泛讨论后,我们制定了标准化的腹腔镜“10 步 TME 手术程序”。回顾腹腔镜 TME 的研究结果,不能得出关于腹腔镜 TME 的安全性和疗效是否等同于或优于开放 TME 的明确结论(Breukink 等人,2006)。实际上,我们正在等待大规模的前瞻性随机研究,比较腹腔镜 TME 与传统的开放手术(Bonjer 等人,丹麦医学公报 56:89-91, 2009)。
基于主要来自非随机研究的证据,腹腔镜 TME 似乎为原发性可切除直肠癌患者带来了可衡量的短期优势(Breukink 等人,5)。在几乎所有已发表的研究中,腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的疗效和技术可行性在围手术期发病率和肿瘤学结果方面均得到了证实。可以强烈推荐标准化的腹腔镜 TME 技术。