Suppr超能文献

采用二维单次激发快速自旋回波(2D SSFSE)、屏气三维快速扰相梯度回波(breathhold 3D FRFSE)和呼吸触发三维快速扰相梯度回波(respiratory-triggered 3D FRFSE)序列评估肝胆胰系统。

Evaluation of the biliary and pancreatic system with 2D SSFSE, breathhold 3D FRFSE and respiratory-triggered 3D FRFSE sequences.

机构信息

Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento DOGIRA, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, Via Santa Sofia 78, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 2010 Apr;115(3):467-82. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0508-1. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The authors compared biliary and pancreatic imaging obtained through 2D single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE), breath-hold 3D fast recovery fast spin-echo (FRFSE) and respiratory-triggered 3D FRFSE sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 106 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) examinations performed between December 2007 and September 2008 were evaluated with a comparison of 2D SSFSE (thin section and thick slab), breath-hold 3D FRFSE and respiratory-triggered 3D FRFSE sequences. The biliary tract was divided into seven segments: right hepatic duct, left hepatic duct, common hepatic duct, cystic duct, common bile duct, cystic duct junction and biliary-pancreatic confluence. The main pancreatic duct was divided into three segments (head, body and tail). Visualisation of biliary variants was also compared. Two blinded radiologists evaluated segment visibility using a quantitative scale. The Student's t test for paired samples was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with 2D SSFSE, respiratory-triggered 3D FRFSE sequences showed better visibility of the right hepatic duct (p=0.0277), the cystic duct (p=0.0081), the cystic duct junction (p=0.0010), the biliary-pancreatic confluence (p=0.0334) and biliary variants (p=0.0198). In the comparison between breath-hold 3D FRFSE and 2D SSFSE, a significant statistical difference was found in visualisation of the cystic duct (p=0.027), the cystic duct junction (p=0.020), the biliary-pancreatic confluence (p=0.0338) and biliary variants (p=0.0311).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional FRFSE offers a significant benefit over conventional 2D imaging.

摘要

目的

作者比较了通过二维单次激发快速自旋回波(SSFSE)、屏气三维快速恢复快速自旋回波(FRFSE)和呼吸触发三维 FRFSE 序列获得的胆道和胰腺成像。

材料和方法

2007 年 12 月至 2008 年 9 月进行的 106 例磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)检查,通过比较二维 SSFSE(薄切片和厚切片)、屏气 3D FRFSE 和呼吸触发 3D FRFSE 序列进行评估。胆道分为 7 个节段:右肝管、左肝管、肝总管、胆囊管、胆总管、胆囊管汇合部和胆胰汇合部。主胰管分为 3 个节段(头、体、尾)。还比较了胆道变异的可视化。两名盲法放射科医生使用定量评分评估节段可视性。使用配对样本学生 t 检验进行统计学分析。

结果

与二维 SSFSE 相比,呼吸触发三维 FRFSE 序列对右肝管(p=0.0277)、胆囊管(p=0.0081)、胆囊管汇合部(p=0.0010)、胆胰汇合部(p=0.0334)和胆道变异(p=0.0198)的显示更好。在屏气 3D FRFSE 与二维 SSFSE 的比较中,胆囊管(p=0.027)、胆囊管汇合部(p=0.020)、胆胰汇合部(p=0.0338)和胆道变异(p=0.0311)的显示存在显著统计学差异。

结论

三维 FRFSE 比传统二维成像有明显优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验