Ahn Chul, Hu Fan, Skinner Celette Sugg
Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009 Jan 15;53(3):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.09.007.
Cluster randomization trials are increasingly popular among healthcare researchers. Intact groups (called 'clusters') of subjects are randomized to receive different interventions and all subjects within a cluster receive the same intervention. In cluster randomized trials, a cluster is the unit of randomization and a subject is the unit of analysis. Variation in cluster sizes can affect the sample size estimate or the power of the study. Guittet et al. (2006) investigated the impact of an imbalance in cluster size on the power of trials with continuous outcomes through simulations. In this paper, we examine the impact of cluster size variation and intracluster correlation on the power of the study for binary outcomes through simulations. Because the sample size formula for cluster randomization trials is based on a large sample approximation, we evaluate the performance of the sample size formula with small sample sizes through simulation. Simulation study findings show that the sample size formula (m(p)) accounting for unequal cluster sizes yields empirical powers closer to the nominal power than the sample size formula (m(a)) for the average cluster size method. The differences in sample size estimates and empirical powers between m(a) and m(p) get smaller as the imbalance in cluster sizes gets smaller.
整群随机试验在医疗保健研究人员中越来越受欢迎。将完整的受试者群体(称为“整群”)随机分配以接受不同的干预措施,并且一个整群内的所有受试者接受相同的干预措施。在整群随机试验中,一个整群是随机化的单位,而一个受试者是分析的单位。整群大小的差异会影响样本量估计或研究效能。吉泰等人(2006年)通过模拟研究了整群大小不均衡对具有连续结局的试验效能的影响。在本文中,我们通过模拟研究整群大小差异和整群内相关性对二元结局研究效能的影响。由于整群随机试验的样本量公式基于大样本近似,我们通过模拟评估小样本量时样本量公式的性能。模拟研究结果表明,考虑了不等整群大小的样本量公式(m(p))比平均整群大小方法的样本量公式(m(a))产生的实际效能更接近名义效能。随着整群大小不均衡程度变小,m(a)和m(p)之间的样本量估计和实际效能差异也会变小。