• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计群集大小不等的整群随机试验:涉及连续结果的实际问题。

Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes.

作者信息

Guittet Lydia, Ravaud Philippe, Giraudeau Bruno

机构信息

Département d'Epidémiologie, Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Bichat-Claude Bernard (AP-HP), Université Xavier Bichat, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Apr 12;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-17.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-6-17
PMID:16611355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1513250/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cluster randomization design is increasingly used for the evaluation of health-care, screening or educational interventions. At the planning stage, sample size calculations usually consider an average cluster size without taking into account any potential imbalance in cluster size. However, there may exist high discrepancies in cluster sizes.

METHODS

We performed simulations to study the impact of an imbalance in cluster size on power. We determined by simulations to which extent four methods proposed to adapt the sample size calculations to a pre-specified imbalance in cluster size could lead to adequately powered trials.

RESULTS

We showed that an imbalance in cluster size can be of high influence on the power in the case of severe imbalance, particularly if the number of clusters is low and/or the intraclass correlation coefficient is high. In the case of a severe imbalance, our simulations confirmed that the minimum variance weights correction of the variation inflaction factor (VIF) used in the sample size calculations has the best properties.

CONCLUSION

Publication of cluster sizes is important to assess the real power of the trial which was conducted and to help designing future trials. We derived an adaptation of the VIF from the minimum variance weights correction to be used in case the imbalance can be a priori formulated such as "a proportion (gamma) of clusters actually recruit a proportion (tau) of subjects to be included (gamma < or = tau)".

摘要

背景

整群随机化设计越来越多地用于评估医疗保健、筛查或教育干预措施。在规划阶段,样本量计算通常考虑平均整群大小,而不考虑整群大小的任何潜在不平衡。然而,整群大小可能存在很大差异。

方法

我们进行了模拟研究整群大小不平衡对检验效能的影响。我们通过模拟确定了为使样本量计算适应预先指定的整群大小不平衡而提出的四种方法在多大程度上可导致检验效能充足的试验。

结果

我们表明,在严重不平衡的情况下,整群大小不平衡可能对检验效能有很大影响,特别是当整群数量较少和/或组内相关系数较高时。在严重不平衡的情况下,我们的模拟证实,样本量计算中使用的变异膨胀因子(VIF)的最小方差权重校正具有最佳特性。

结论

公布整群大小对于评估所进行试验的实际检验效能以及帮助设计未来试验很重要。我们从最小方差权重校正中推导了VIF的一种调整方法,以便在不平衡可以先验确定的情况下使用,例如“一定比例(γ)的整群实际招募了一定比例(τ)的纳入受试者(γ≤τ)”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/501de3c5c1a8/1471-2288-6-17-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/a21493bf687c/1471-2288-6-17-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/f3cf39d7b3b5/1471-2288-6-17-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/6502dd1a032d/1471-2288-6-17-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/501de3c5c1a8/1471-2288-6-17-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/a21493bf687c/1471-2288-6-17-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/f3cf39d7b3b5/1471-2288-6-17-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/6502dd1a032d/1471-2288-6-17-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1875/1513250/501de3c5c1a8/1471-2288-6-17-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes.设计群集大小不等的整群随机试验:涉及连续结果的实际问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Apr 12;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-17.
2
An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.在具有连续结局的横断面、阶梯式整群随机试验中,整群大小的不平衡不会导致显著的效能损失。
Trials. 2017 Mar 7;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1832-8.
3
A priori postulated and real power in cluster randomized trials: mind the gap.整群随机试验中的先验假设功效与实际功效:注意差距。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 18;5:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-25.
4
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.不同聚类大小对横向阶段-推移群组随机试验的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0760-6.
5
Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations.英格兰和威尔士全科医疗试验中集群大小不均:对样本量计算的影响。
Stat Med. 2001 Feb 15;20(3):377-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<377::aid-sim799>3.0.co;2-n.
6
How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.整群随机试验中协变量失衡的后果有多大:一项针对连续结局和整群水平二元协变量的模拟研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jul 11;16:79. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0182-7.
7
A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.基于社区的整群随机对照试验中二元结局的组内相关系数置信区间方法比较。
Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):180-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774515606377. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
8
Relative efficiency and sample size for cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.具有变群大小的群组随机试验的相对效率和样本含量。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):27-36. doi: 10.1177/1740774510391492. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
9
A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.在群组随机试验和拟合二项结局的 GEE 型边缘模型的背景下,一种现成的改进方法,可以用于估计群组内相关性。
Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):41-51. doi: 10.1177/1740774518803635. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.群组随机对照试验的设计与分析:在加性风险混合模型下的生存时间结局。
Stat Med. 2022 Oct 30;41(24):4860-4885. doi: 10.1002/sim.9541. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for Data and Safety Monitoring in Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trials Using Case Studies.实用随机临床试验中基于案例研究的数据和安全监测指南。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Nov;98(11):1712-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.02.019.
2
Global biogeography of living brachiopods: Bioregionalization patterns and possible controls.活腕足动物的全球生物地理学:生物区划分型模式及其可能的控制因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0259004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259004. eCollection 2021.
3
Methods for dealing with unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care.21世纪整群随机试验的经验教训:基层医疗试验的系统评价
Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;1(1):80-90. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn006rr.
2
A priori postulated and real power in cluster randomized trials: mind the gap.整群随机试验中的先验假设功效与实际功效:注意差距。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 18;5:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-25.
3
Intraclass correlation coefficient and outcome prevalence are associated in clustered binary data.
处理整群随机试验中不等群组大小的方法:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0255389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255389. eCollection 2021.
4
Type I error control for cluster randomized trials under varying small sample structures.在不同小样本结构下的群组随机试验的 I 型错误控制。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 3;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01236-7.
5
Sample Size Calculation for Count Outcomes in Cluster Randomization Trials with Varying Cluster Sizes.聚类大小不同的整群随机试验中计数结局的样本量计算
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2020;49(1):116-124. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2018.1532004. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
Can General Practitioners manage mental disorders in primary care? A partially randomised, pragmatic, cluster trial.全科医生能否在初级保健中管理精神障碍?一项部分随机、实用、群组试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224724. eCollection 2019.
7
Engaging Caregivers in Health-Related Housing Decisions for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Cluster Randomized Trial.让照顾者参与认知障碍老年人的与健康相关的住房决策:一项集群随机试验。
Gerontologist. 2020 Jul 15;60(5):947-957. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz045.
8
Comparing Educational Music Therapy Interventions via Stages of Recovery with Adults in an Acute Care Mental Health Setting: A Cluster-Randomized Pilot Effectiveness Study.比较急性心理保健环境中成人康复阶段的教育音乐治疗干预:一项集群随机试验有效性研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 May;55(4):624-630. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00380-1. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
9
Music Therapy for Coping Self-Efficacy in an Acute Mental Health Setting: A Randomized Pilot Study.音乐治疗对急性心理健康环境中的应对自我效能的影响:一项随机试点研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 May;55(4):615-623. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0319-8. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
10
Evaluating the impact of multilevel evidence-based implementation strategies to enhance provider recommendation on human papillomavirus vaccination rates among an empaneled primary care patient population: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.评估基于多层次证据的实施策略对增强提供者推荐人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率的影响:一项针对在册初级保健患者人群的阶梯式楔形集群随机试验研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 13;13(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0778-x.
组内相关系数与结局患病率在聚类二元数据中相关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.012.
4
The Gini coefficient as a measure for understanding accrual inequalities in multicenter clinical studies.基尼系数作为一种用于理解多中心临床研究中应计不平等现象的度量方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;57(4):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.011.
5
CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.CONSORT声明:群组随机试验扩展版
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):702-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702.
6
Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals.整群随机试验的偏倚风险证据:对发表在三本综合医学期刊上的近期试验的综述
BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):785-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7418.785.
7
A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中组内相关系数置信区间方法的比较
Stat Med. 2002 Dec 30;21(24):3757-74. doi: 10.1002/sim.1330.
8
Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.整群随机试验中的样本量重新估计
Stat Med. 2002 May 30;21(10):1337-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.1121.
9
Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: data from the MRC Trial of the Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community.基层医疗中整群随机试验的组内相关系数:来自医学研究委员会社区老年人评估与管理试验的数据。
Control Clin Trials. 2002 Aug;23(4):409-21. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00208-8.
10
Intraclass correlation for measures from a middle school nutrition intervention study: estimates, correlates, and applications.一项中学营养干预研究中测量指标的组内相关性:估计值、相关因素及应用
Health Educ Behav. 2001 Dec;28(6):666-79. doi: 10.1177/109019810102800602.