Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 20;30(3):916-29. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2062-09.2010.
We examined neural spike recordings from prefrontal cortex (PFC) while monkeys performed a delayed somatosensory discrimination task. In general, PFC neurons displayed great heterogeneity in response to the task. That is, although individual cells spiked reliably in response to task variables from trial-to-trial, each cell had idiosyncratic combinations of response properties. Despite the great variety in response types, some general patterns held. We used linear regression analysis on the spike data to both display the full heterogeneity of the data and classify cells into categories. We compared different categories of cells and found little difference in their ability to carry information about task variables or their correlation to behavior. This suggests a distributed neural code for the task rather than a highly modularized one. Along this line, we compared the predictions of two theoretical models to the data. We found that cell types predicted by both models were not represented significantly in the population. Our study points to a different class of models that should embrace the inherent heterogeneity of the data, but should also account for the nonrandom features of the population.
我们在猴子执行延迟体感辨别任务时,检查了前额皮质(PFC)的神经尖峰记录。一般来说,PFC 神经元对任务的反应表现出很大的异质性。也就是说,尽管个别细胞在每次试验中都能可靠地对任务变量进行尖峰反应,但每个细胞的反应特性都有其独特的组合。尽管反应类型多种多样,但仍存在一些普遍模式。我们使用线性回归分析对尖峰数据进行分析,以显示数据的完全异质性,并对细胞进行分类。我们比较了不同类别的细胞,发现它们在携带任务变量信息的能力或与行为的相关性方面几乎没有差异。这表明任务的神经编码是分布式的,而不是高度模块化的。沿着这条线,我们将两个理论模型的预测与数据进行了比较。我们发现,两种模型预测的细胞类型在群体中没有显著代表性。我们的研究指出了一类不同的模型,这些模型应该包含数据固有的异质性,但也应该考虑到群体的非随机特征。