Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Institute of Digestive Disease and Nutrition, Korea University College of Medicine, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-705, Korea.
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Oct;55(10):2940-4. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1096-6. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
Success rate of cecal intubation, endoscopist's difficulty, and procedure-related patient pain are still problems for beginners performing colonoscopy. New methods to aid colonoscopic insertion such as warm water instillation and oil lubrication have been proposed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using warm water or oil in colonoscopy.
Colonoscopy was performed in 117 unsedated patients by three endoscopists-in-training. Patients were randomly allocated to three groups, using a conventional method with administration of antispasmodics, warm water instillation, and oil lubrication, respectively. Success rate of total intubation within time limit (15 min), cecal intubation time, degree of endoscopist's difficulty, and level of patient discomfort were compared among the three groups.
Cecal intubation time was shorter in the warm water group than in the conventional and oil groups. Degree of procedural difficulty was lower in the warm water group, and patient pain score was higher in the oil lubrication group, compared with the other groups. However, there was no significant difference in success rate of intubation within time limit among the three groups.
The warm water method is a simple, safe, and feasible method for beginners. Oil lubrication may not be a useful method compared with conventional and warm water method.
对于初学者来说,盲肠插管成功率、内镜医师操作难度和与操作相关的患者疼痛仍然是问题。已经提出了新的方法来辅助结肠镜插入,如温水灌注和油润滑。本研究旨在评估在结肠镜检查中使用温水或油的可行性。
117 名未镇静的患者由三位内镜医师进行结肠镜检查。患者被随机分配到三组,分别采用常规方法加用解痉药、温水灌注和油润滑。比较三组的总插管成功率(15 分钟内)、盲肠插管时间、内镜医师操作难度程度和患者不适程度。
与常规组和油组相比,温水组的盲肠插管时间更短。与其他组相比,温水组的操作难度程度较低,而油润滑组的患者疼痛评分较高。然而,三组的插管成功率在规定时间内没有显著差异。
温水法对于初学者来说是一种简单、安全且可行的方法。与常规方法和温水方法相比,油润滑可能不是一种有用的方法。