Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education (CHIME), Whittington Campus (University College London), Highgate Hill, London N19 5LW, UK.
Pain. 2010 Mar;148(3):481-486. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
The effects of two contextual factors, group membership and staff turnover, on the outcome of group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for persistent pain were investigated. The data came from end of treatment and 1 month follow-up assessments of 3050 individuals who attended an intensive group programme over 16 years. Intraclass correlations (ICC) showed significant intragroup effects on self-efficacy (ICC=0.16 at end of treatment; 0.12 at 1 month), catastrophizing (ICC=0.06; 0.13) and distance walked (ICC=0.20; 0.19). This underlines the importance of modelling group membership when analyzing data from group interventions. Linear regression showed that high periods of staff turnover were significantly related to poorer outcomes on self-efficacy and distance walked at end of treatment, with the effect on self-efficacy persisting to 1 month follow-up. Having demonstrated significant contextual effects in an existing data set, further research is needed to explore the mechanisms by which these effects operate.
研究了两个情境因素,即群体成员身份和员工流动率,对持续性疼痛的团体认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗结果的影响。这些数据来自于 16 年来 3050 名参加密集团体项目的个体在治疗结束时和 1 个月随访时的评估。组内相关系数(ICC)显示自我效能感(治疗结束时的 ICC=0.16;1 个月时的 ICC=0.12)、灾难化(ICC=0.06;0.13)和行走距离(ICC=0.20;0.19)方面存在显著的组内效应。这强调了在分析团体干预数据时,对团体成员身份进行建模的重要性。线性回归显示,员工流动率高与治疗结束时自我效能感和行走距离的较差结果显著相关,而对自我效能感的影响持续到 1 个月的随访。在现有数据集内证明了显著的情境效应后,需要进一步研究这些效应的作用机制。