Lu Jin-Chun, Huang Yu-Feng, Lü Nian-Qing
Department of Laboratory Science, Nanjing Hospital, Jiangsu Corps, The Armed Police Force, PLA , Nanjing, Jiangsu 210028, China.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2010 Oct;16(10):867-71.
The 5th edition of WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen (2010) represents a comprehensive revision. This article aims to explore the applicability of this manual to andrology laboratories in China mainland in view of sperm count analysis, sperm motility analysis, sperm morphology analysis, sperm function analysis, anti-sperm antibody and seminal plasma biochemical marker analysis, and quality assurance and quality control of semen analysis. The authors deem that its recommendation to the analysis method and lower reference limit of sperm concentration may be a little arbitrary and lack of evidence-based support, that the revised grading sperm motility, the strict criteria and the very low cut-off value of 4% morphologically normal spermatozoa for the evaluation of sperm morphology are not applicable to andrology laboratories in China mainland, that the sperm function markers need to be supplemented, and that the determination methods of anti-sperm antibody and seminal plasma biochemical markers are incompatible with the status of Chinese andrology laboratories. However, its recommended methods for quality assurance and quality control of semen analysis have a significant directive role in China mainland. It is worth to point out that the WHO manual ignored the data obtained from Chinese which accounts for approximate 20% of the world population. Thus, given the importance of the WHO manual, its general applicability should be evaluated in China.
《世界卫生组织人类精液检查与处理实验室手册》第5版(2010年)是一次全面修订。本文旨在从精子计数分析、精子活力分析、精子形态分析、精子功能分析、抗精子抗体和精浆生化标志物分析以及精液分析的质量保证和质量控制等方面,探讨该手册在中国大陆男科实验室的适用性。作者认为,其对精子浓度分析方法和下限参考值的推荐可能略显随意,缺乏循证支持;修订后的精子活力分级、严格的标准以及形态正常精子比例4%的极低临界值不适用于中国大陆男科实验室;精子功能标志物有待补充;抗精子抗体和精浆生化标志物的检测方法与中国大陆男科实验室现状不匹配。然而,其推荐的精液分析质量保证和质量控制方法在中国大陆具有重要的指导作用。值得指出的是,世界卫生组织手册忽略了占世界人口约20%的中国人的数据。鉴于世界卫生组织手册的重要性,应在中国评估其普遍适用性。