• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前意识加工偏向预测对压力的情绪反应。

Preconscious processing biases predict emotional reactivity to stress.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Feb 15;67(4):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.018.

DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.018
PMID:20113741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2814187/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anxiety vulnerability is associated with biases in attention: a tendency to selectively process negative relative to neutral or positive information. It is not clear whether this bias is: 1) related to the physiological response to stressful events, and 2) causally related to the development of anxiety disorders.

METHODS

We tested the predictive value of both preconscious and conscious attention biases in a prospective study of stress reactivity in a nonclinical sample. One hundred four male participants were assessed at baseline and then again 4 months (n = 82) and 8 months later (n = 70). Salivary cortisol and self-report measures were obtained at the baseline testing session in addition to measures of biased attention. Subsequent emotional reactivity was assessed by means of salivary cortisol and self-reported state-anxiety responses during a laboratory-based stressor (4 months later) as well as during a real-life stressor 8 months later (i.e., examination period).

RESULTS

Regression analyses indicated that a preconscious negative processing bias was the best predictor of the cortisol response to stressful events. Importantly, a measure of selective processing provided a better indicator of subsequent emotional reactivity than self-report measures of neuroticism, trait-anxiety, and extraversion.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that preconscious biases toward negative material play a causal role in heightened anxiety vulnerability. Our results illustrate the potential utility of preconscious biases in attention in providing an early marker of anxiety vulnerability and a potential target for treatment intervention.

摘要

背景

焦虑易损性与注意力偏差有关:一种选择性地处理负性相对于中性或正性信息的倾向。目前尚不清楚这种偏差是否:1)与对应激事件的生理反应有关,和 2)与焦虑障碍的发展有因果关系。

方法

我们在一项非临床应激反应前瞻性研究中测试了前意识和意识注意力偏差的预测价值。104 名男性参与者在基线时接受评估,然后在 4 个月(n = 82)和 8 个月后(n = 70)再次接受评估。除了注意力偏差的测量,在基线测试中还获得了唾液皮质醇和自我报告的测量。随后通过唾液皮质醇和自我报告的状态焦虑反应来评估情绪反应,分别在 4 个月后的实验室应激源期间和 8 个月后的现实生活应激源期间(即考试期间)进行评估。

结果

回归分析表明,前意识的负性加工偏差是应激事件皮质醇反应的最佳预测指标。重要的是,选择性加工的测量比神经质、特质焦虑和外向性的自我报告测量更能预示随后的情绪反应。

结论

这些结果表明,对负性材料的前意识偏差在增强焦虑易损性方面起着因果作用。我们的结果表明,注意中的前意识偏差在提供焦虑易损性的早期标志物和潜在的治疗干预靶点方面具有潜在的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f876/3778986/3dcf744980b4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f876/3778986/3d33b6f8e59d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f876/3778986/3dcf744980b4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f876/3778986/3d33b6f8e59d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f876/3778986/3dcf744980b4/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Preconscious processing biases predict emotional reactivity to stress.前意识加工偏向预测对压力的情绪反应。
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Feb 15;67(4):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.018.
2
A single administration of cortisol acutely reduces preconscious attention for fear in anxious young men.单次给予皮质醇会急性降低焦虑青年男性对恐惧的前意识注意力。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Aug;32(7):793-802. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
3
Automatic emotional information processing and the cortisol response to acute psychosocial stress.自动情绪信息处理与急性心理社会应激的皮质醇反应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 Mar;10(1):71-82. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.1.71.
4
Cortisol responses enhance negative valence perception for ambiguous facial expressions.皮质醇反应增强了对模糊面部表情的负性效价感知。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 8;7(1):15107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14846-3.
5
Asymmetrical transfer effects of cognitive bias modification: Modifying attention to threat influences interpretation of emotional ambiguity, but not vice versa.认知偏差修正的不对称转移效应:改变对威胁的注意力会影响对情绪模糊性的解读,但反之则不然。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;54:239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
6
Attentional bias mediates the effect of neurostimulation on emotional vulnerability.注意偏向介导了神经刺激对情绪易损性的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Oct;93:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 22.
7
Social Anxiety-Linked Attention Bias to Threat Is Indirectly Related to Post-Event Processing Via Subjective Emotional Reactivity to Social Stress.社交焦虑相关的对威胁的注意偏向通过对社交压力的主观情绪反应与事件后加工间接相关。
Behav Ther. 2016 May;47(3):377-87. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Resilience characteristics and prior life stress determine anticipatory response to acute social stress in children aged 7-11 years.韧性特征和先前的生活压力决定了 7-11 岁儿童对急性社会压力的预期反应。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):282-297. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12353. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
9
Attentional Bias towards Positive Emotion Predicts Stress Resilience.对积极情绪的注意偏向预测压力恢复力。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 23;11(3):e0148368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148368. eCollection 2016.
10
Is preattentive bias predictive of autonomic reactivity in response to a stressor?前注意偏差能否预测对应激源的自主反应性?
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Apr;23(3):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of ABM on attentional networks and stress-induced emotional reactivity in a mixed clinical sample with depression: A randomized sham-controlled trial.ABM对伴有抑郁症的混合临床样本中注意力网络及应激诱导情绪反应性的影响:一项随机假对照试验。
Neurosci Appl. 2024 Sep 24;3:104091. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104091. eCollection 2024.
2
Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks.向着自杀风险的客观特征描述迈进:基于实验室的认知和行为任务的叙述性综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Oct;153:105361. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105361. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Looking on the bright side: biased attention and the human serotonin transporter gene.看到光明的一面:注意力偏差与人类血清素转运体基因
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 May 22;276(1663):1747-51. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1788. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
2
Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles.认知偏差矫正研究何去何从?对专题文章的评论
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Feb;118(1):89-99. doi: 10.1037/a0014878.
3
Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑症患者的注意力调节程序
Fitness Dance Counteracts Female Ph.D. Candidates' Stress by Affecting Emotion Regulation.
健身舞通过影响情绪调节来缓解女博士候选人的压力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;19(22):14627. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214627.
4
A hypothetic model for examining the relationship between happiness, forgiveness, emotional reactivity and emotional security.一个用于检验幸福、宽恕、情绪反应性和情绪安全感之间关系的假设模型。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 29:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02909-2.
5
Feelings of fear, sadness, and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from two studies in the UK.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的恐惧、悲伤和孤独感:来自英国两项研究的结果。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Dec 1;295:1012-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.031. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
6
Functions of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in emotion regulation under stress.腹内侧前额叶皮质在应激下情绪调节中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):18225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97751-0.
7
Cognitive Control and Ruminative Responses to Stress: Understanding the Different Facets of Cognitive Control.认知控制与对压力的反复思考反应:理解认知控制的不同方面
Front Psychol. 2021 May 7;12:660062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660062. eCollection 2021.
8
Toward Emotion Recognition From Physiological Signals in the Wild: Approaching the Methodological Issues in Real-Life Data Collection.迈向野外生理信号情感识别:解决现实生活数据收集的方法学问题
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01111. eCollection 2020.
9
Working Memory Predicts Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Response to Psychosocial Stress in Males.工作记忆可预测男性下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴对心理社会压力的反应。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 28;11:142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00142. eCollection 2020.
10
Changing interpretations of emotional expressions in working memory with aging.工作记忆中情绪表达随年龄变化的解读改变。
Emotion. 2019 Sep;19(6):1060-1069. doi: 10.1037/emo0000481. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Feb;118(1):28-33. doi: 10.1037/a0012589.
4
Attention training for generalized social anxiety disorder.广泛性社交焦虑障碍的注意力训练
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Feb;118(1):5-14. doi: 10.1037/a0013643.
5
A glimmer of light for neuropsychiatric disorders.神经精神疾病的一线曙光。
Nature. 2008 Oct 16;455(7215):890-3. doi: 10.1038/nature07454.
6
Cutting stress off at the pass: reducing vigilance and responsiveness to social threat by manipulating attention.在源头切断压力:通过操控注意力降低对社会威胁的警惕性和反应能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;93(4):651-66. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.651.
7
Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders.对情绪障碍的认知易感性。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:167-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916.
8
A whole genome association study of neuroticism using DNA pooling.一项使用DNA池化技术对神经质进行的全基因组关联研究。
Mol Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;13(3):302-12. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002048. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
9
Temporal course and structural relationships among dimensions of temperament and DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorder constructs.气质维度与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版焦虑及心境障碍结构之间的时间进程和结构关系。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 May;116(2):313-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.313.
10
Skin conductance responses as predictor of emotional responses to stressful life events.皮肤电传导反应作为对压力性生活事件情绪反应的预测指标。
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Oct;45(10):2456-63. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 Mar 12.