Unit for Preventive Nutrition, Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.042.
Large-scale policy and environmental changes, such as congestion road taxes, may be a way to promote active transportation.
This study aimed to examine the potential effect of a congestion road tax on physical activity.
Baseline data were collected during October-November 2003, follow-up data in May 2006, and analysis was performed in September 2008. The short self-administered version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to assess physical activity. Data from those with access to motorized vehicles in the Stockholm region (n=165), where the tax was in place, were compared with those from the Göteborg/Malmö regions (n=138). Within each region before and during the road tax implementation, the data were analyzed for differences in time spent at different intensity levels of physical activity, in addition to sitting, as well as for changes in reported time in overall (weighted) physical activity.
There were no significant differences in the magnitude of the changes of the intensity levels of physical activity, weighted overall physical activity, or sitting, between Stockholm and Göteborg/Malmö. Among those exposed to the congestion road tax and with access to motorized vehicles, an increase in moderate physical activity (p=0.036); overall physical activity (p=0.015); and a reduction in time spent sitting (p=0.009) was observed. No differences were observed among those unexposed.
The results from this study on the influence of a congestion road tax on levels of physical activity, though inconclusive, suggest that policy changes such as a congestion road tax might promote improvements in physical activity levels in individuals with motorized vehicles.
大规模的政策和环境变化,如拥堵道路税,可能是促进积极交通的一种方式。
本研究旨在探讨拥堵道路税对身体活动的潜在影响。
基线数据于 2003 年 10 月至 11 月收集,随访数据于 2006 年 5 月收集,分析于 2008 年 9 月进行。使用国际体力活动问卷的简短自我管理版本评估身体活动。对斯德哥尔摩地区(n=165)有机会使用机动车的人和哥德堡/马尔默地区(n=138)的数据进行了比较,在那里实施了该税。在每个地区,在道路税实施之前和期间,分析了不同体力活动强度水平(包括坐着)的时间差异,以及报告的总(加权)体力活动时间的变化。
斯德哥尔摩和哥德堡/马尔默之间在体力活动强度水平、加权总体体力活动或坐着的变化幅度上没有显著差异。在接触拥堵道路税且有机会使用机动车的人中,观察到中等强度体力活动(p=0.036)、总体体力活动(p=0.015)和坐着时间减少(p=0.009)的增加。在未暴露的人中未观察到差异。
尽管本研究对拥堵道路税对身体活动水平的影响结果不确定,但表明政策变化,如拥堵道路税,可能会促进有机动车的个体的身体活动水平的提高。